How about this: https://www.opr.ca.gov/s_listoforganizations.php
or this https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
or this https://www.c2es.org/docUploads/federal-agencies-adaptation.pdf
or the EPA which Scott Pruitt runs: https://www.epa.gov/climate-change-science/causes-climate-change
or all of these: http://www.scirp.org/journal/ajcc/
I'd post more but there are currently over 100,000 peer reviewed scientific articles drawing a conclusion that humans are the primary cause for global climate change. Humans are the primary cause of climate change is now fact.
Owned.
Sounds like desperate scientists wanting funding. Fake news.
You asked for facts, so you were provided with links with studies/research and your response is ... 'Desperate scientists wanting funding. Fake news'. Ummm???
It's hard take your position on this issue seriously when your rebuttal is incredibly lazy. I was willing to listen to your reasoning as to why you don't believe it's real, but I have no interest in doing so if you're too lazy to present your own arguments, especially when you expect it from the opposite side.
You posted links to quack science and government sponsored organizations.
I didn't post anything. Someone else posted those in response to you. Again, stop being lazy about this. If you actually want to have a proper discussion, then do so.
This comes from an exclusive story from Reuters --
I loved my previous life. I had so many things going," Trump told Reuters in an interview. "This is more work than in my previous life. I thought it would be easier."
...
More than five months after his victory and two days shy of the 100-day mark of his presidency, the election is still on Trump's mind. Midway through a discussion about Chinese President Xi Jinping, the president paused to hand out copies of what he said were the latest figures from the 2016 electoral map.
"Here, you can take that, that's the final map of the numbers," the Republican president said from his desk in the Oval Office, handing out maps of the United States with areas he won marked in red. "It’s pretty good, right? The red is obviously us."
How about this: https://www.opr.ca.gov/s_listoforganizations.php
or this https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
or this https://www.c2es.org/docUploads/federal-agencies-adaptation.pdf
or the EPA which Scott Pruitt runs: https://www.epa.gov/climate-change-science/causes-climate-change
or all of these: http://www.scirp.org/journal/ajcc/
I'd post more but there are currently over 100,000 peer reviewed scientific articles drawing a conclusion that humans are the primary cause for global climate change. Humans are the primary cause of climate change is now fact.
Owned.
Sounds like desperate scientists wanting funding. Fake news.
You asked for facts, so you were provided with links with studies/research and your response is ... 'Desperate scientists wanting funding. Fake news'. Ummm???
It's hard take your position on this issue seriously when your rebuttal is incredibly lazy. I was willing to listen to your reasoning as to why you don't believe it's real, but I have no interest in doing so if you're too lazy to present your own arguments, especially when you expect it from the opposite side.
@Litchie: Sometimes though, quality is better than quantity. It'd be nice if there were more titles at launch, but Nintendo spacing out games throughout the first nine six months will make it an easy recommendation by the time the Holidays roll around. I think that's their intention, too.
Indeed. Luckily the game to get on launch is a Zelda, and a huge one at that. The weak launch line-up is way easier to forgive because of that.
For sure. If it wasn't for Zelda, I would have waited until Summer or Fall to get a Switch. Being able to take Zelda with me on the go is a huge plus since I mostly game on my commute, so it was an easy decision for me.
Log in to comment