Quick way to understand scores: (These are just my opinions, not facts) Gamespot: 9, 9.5, 10: a fun, noob-friendly game 8, 8.5: a fun, noob-friendly game, only if you like the game's genre 7, 7.5: a fun game, only if you like the game's genre Gamerankings: (Critic score on Gamespot): 90-100: almost no flaws 80-90: enjoyable from the start to the end (if any) 70-80: fun, but might have some flaws you have to overlook. User Score: 90-100: loved by fans of the genre\franchise
I uh, guess they made too much of a big jump with convection. Changing the formula is a good thing, but I think that should be done step by step. Then again, I was just to ****ed at Convection to play it, so I wouldn't really know.
GTA 4, you either love the game for its living and breathing city or you hate the game for its convoluted story, repetitive missions and its sacrifice of over-the-top gameplay for gritty realism.hiphops_savior
I agree, actually. San Andreas had some level of variaty that kept it alive. IV doesn't.
umm, PC. Because you can play games from 1990 to 2010, that's 20 years worth of games. Besides, if you get a 360, you'll have to pay for LIVE each month. [QUOTE="AbleFa3"]
[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]
Pc is obviously the best choice objectively.
Subjectively it can go either way.
Objectively PS3/360 is the best, since you get all major PC games and their own exclusives PC will never get
You're already wrong, since you won't get to play thousands of older PC games on 360. If you're saying you don't care for graphics, it wouldn't be wise to ignore all those gems. :D
Log in to comment