[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="TheGuardian03"]I think it looks great, the art style is fantastic.wis3boi

Gears is about gameplay and graphics.Miketheman83

[QUOTE="gameplaycontrol"][QUOTE="DarkLink77"] Naughty Dog has actually been around longer than Blizzard, believe it or not. :PCherokee_Jack

Actually it's not.

First game published under the Naughty Dog name came out in 1989, and they published under a different name years before that. Blizzard's first game (as Silicon and Synapse) was in 1991.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon_%26_Synapse#Titles

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naughty_Dog#Games

[QUOTE="brennanhuff"]

[QUOTE="JohnF111"]So three of your so called shady business deals were nothing more than a google result without you even taking the time to read them. The rootkit was low and the antitrust things were valid but that's about it. Make some effort next time.

JohnF111

The rootkit is low? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Try reading what that actually is and the intent. That alone is enough to warrant Sony as shady.

I am actually going through the problem with the HDTV so no it wasn't a google search and Sony is being incredibly difficult about it.

Fake critic is hilariously shady. They don't even have confidence in their own products.

And keep ignoring the network hack, which happened because of SHADY SONY BUSINESS PRACTICES.

And I love how you brush off the antitrust laws and investigations and tell me to try harder. I don't think you can try any harder to defend a corporation that literally is setout to screw consumers to maximize profits and protect their intellectual properties.

Out of warranty? Out of luck... Deal with it, if your warranty is gone then it's too bad, a warranty promises a product will last at least that long, if it does then that promise was fulfilled is this hard to understand?

And how did i brush off the antitrust ones? I said they were valid reasons for Sony to be considered shady... Again learn english and understand what is being said before replying in block capitals.

[QUOTE="TrapJak"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"]

They'd have to change the industry at least three times to be where Blizzard is. Not going to happen.

DarkLink77

[QUOTE="TrapJak"]

[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]

Random insults, such as?

And boy do I feel it's overrated! I mean, If I break it into it's various elements: Platforming - Awful /Story - Predictable, cliched / Puzzles - Almost as bad as the platforming / Graphics - Very asthetically pleasing

It's simply got tons of room for improvement, far too much flaws to garner the praise it's recieved.

That being said, it's a good game, almost as good as Gears. Whilst Gears admittedly doesnt even have platforming, puzzles or a story, it excells at shooting, which i'd imagine is most important in a TPS.

-Snooze-

I believed the platforming, while scripted and jointed, was pretty spot on, especially in Multiplayer and Highrise. The Story, well I agree, but the storytelling is flawless. Puzzles, I actually agree. Wish it was more UC1.

I don't hate your opinion, you can hate, love, or like a game as much as you want. Just when it comes to games, don't vary to the point to call another game overrated.

Of course it's all opinion. It's my opinion that UC2 is overrated, im sure tons of people disagree, and fair play to them

I do have to say though ... How does anyone even consider the platforming in UC platforming? You can literally do it with your eyes closed. Try that in Mario Galaxy, or even Tomb Raider.