gamerman1011's forum posts

Avatar image for gamerman1011
gamerman1011

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By gamerman1011
Member since 2013 • 80 Posts

what?? i dont even

Avatar image for gamerman1011
gamerman1011

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By gamerman1011
Member since 2013 • 80 Posts

1

Avatar image for gamerman1011
gamerman1011

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 gamerman1011
Member since 2013 • 80 Posts

prepare my anus for what?

Avatar image for gamerman1011
gamerman1011

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 gamerman1011
Member since 2013 • 80 Posts

idk just found it interesting

Avatar image for gamerman1011
gamerman1011

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By gamerman1011
Member since 2013 • 80 Posts

http://redicecreations.com/article.php?id=31129

http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=19566#.U9hnVdxdUZI

Scientific evidence refuting the theory of modern humanity’s African genesis is common knowledge among those familiar with the most recent scientific papers on the human Genome, Mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosomes. Regrettably, within mainstream press and academia circles, there seems to be a conspicuous – and dare we say it – deliberate vacuum when it comes to reporting news of these recent studies and their obvious implications.

Australian historian Greg Jefferys explains that, "The whole ‘Out of Africa’ myth has its roots in the mainstream academic campaign in the 1990′s to remove the concept of Race. When I did my degree they all spent a lot of time on the ‘Out of Africa’ thing but it’s been completely disproved by genetics. Mainstream still hold on to it."

Seven thousand five hundred fifty-six (7556) haplotypes of 46 subclades in 17 major haplogroups were considered in terms of their base (ancestral) haplotypes and timespans to their common ancestors, for the purposes of designing of time-balanced haplogroup tree. It was found that African haplogroup A (originated 132,000 ± 12,000 years before present) is very remote time-wise from all other haplogroups, which have a separate common ancestor, named β-haplogroup, and originated 64,000 ± 6000 ybp. It includes a family of Europeoid (Caucasoid) haplogroups from F through T that originated 58,000 ± 5000 ybp. A downstream common ancestor for haplogroup A and β-haplogroup, coined the α-haplogroup emerged 160,000 ± 12,000 ybp. A territorial origin of haplogroups α- and β-remains unknown; however, the most likely origin for each of them is a vast triangle stretched from Central Europe in the west through the Russian Plain to the east and to Levant to the south. Haplogroup B is descended from β-haplogroup (and not from haplogroup A, from which it is very distant, and separated by as much as 123,000 years of “lat- eral” mutational evolution) likely migrated to Africa after 46,000 ybp. The finding that the Europeoid haplogroups did not descend from “African” haplogroups A or B is supported by the fact that bearers of the Europeoid haplogroups, as well as all non-African haplogroups do not carry either SNPs M91, P97, M31, P82, M23, M114, P262, M32, M59, P289, P291, P102, M13, M171, M118 (haplogroup A and its subclades SNPs) or M60, M181, P90 (haplogroup B), as it was shown recently in “Walk through Y” FTDNA Project (the reference is incorporated therein) on several hundred people from various haplogroups.

Avatar image for gamerman1011
gamerman1011

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 gamerman1011
Member since 2013 • 80 Posts

pc gaming is alot better than, playing movies on the moviestation 3

Avatar image for gamerman1011
gamerman1011

80

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 gamerman1011
Member since 2013 • 80 Posts

sounds like your cards overheating