glorious_blue's forum posts

  • 15 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for glorious_blue
glorious_blue

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 glorious_blue
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

They're such different games. True, III was this grand conceptual piece, but Oblivion was more playable. That's not to say it was dumbed down, but more polished for sure. IV is a great game, despite some of your protestations. It is fun and it's supposed to be a grand adventure, whereas III is more like a wandering with adventure thrown in. I enjoy wandering and the intricacies, but IV had them too and it was more fun.

It's the cool thing to like III better because that makes you a hardcore gamer, it makes you intellectually superior to others who disagree. It's the "I liked _____ better when it was underground" disease. Some people don't want to like IV because only the best and hardcorest (sic) played III. Just like movies and bands, games that allow someone to feel superior to others and elicit nostalgia will be remembered most fondly.

III was a great game, but not for everyone. Some people thought it just wasn't fun (and I'm sure that some of you think that makes those people "dumb." If that be the case, I may need to shoot your high horse.). IV was a great game and it was for a larger audience, though certainly no everyone. In you're wondering where I stand, I give you one answer - I liked Madden when it was underground.

Avatar image for glorious_blue
glorious_blue

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 glorious_blue
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
Microsoft's interest is specifically in winning the war versus Sony. That means doing whatever it takes. They're setting themselves up for the nex 20 years of battle, not just for a particular game. It's not that they want the game on the system to make money off of it, they want the game on the system so that people don't feel the need to buy a PS3 to play certain games. They're smart and its good a good way to stay on top. It makes your system more desireable to both gamers and, importantly, developers, who see that your product has greater market penetration.
Avatar image for glorious_blue
glorious_blue

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 glorious_blue
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
Hero is right, these games aren't supposed to be competitors, but that doesn't mean one can't be better than another. For their purposes, I think that they'll probably both be very good games, and each better than the other for certain people. That being said, I'm not good at Smash Bros and enjoy the Metroid world. The multiplayer game I really would like to see would be a great Bomberman.
Avatar image for glorious_blue
glorious_blue

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 glorious_blue
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
It's not that great of a game because it doesn't need to be. They aren't trying to really do anything new, they just want to make it fun and appealing to the Harry Potter fan base. Who doesn't want to play as Harry flippin' Potter? I know I do. When we read the books we want those powers so we get them in the game. It's not a bad game, it just isn't being designed to be great. It's designed to please X group of people. They're going to sell to a significant number of people no matter the quality and spending more money equals dimininshing returns and a smaller profit margin. It would have to be a truly exceptional game to pull in more than just a few more HP fans and it just isn't cost effective. If you like Harry Potter, you'll like the game well enough as well.
Avatar image for glorious_blue
glorious_blue

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 glorious_blue
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
I am severely pro-bomberman in brawl. bomberman 64 and I still hang out.
Avatar image for glorious_blue
glorious_blue

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 glorious_blue
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

PC gaming had branched to be primarily serving the tetris crowd. Those games don't make a ton of money, mostly donations and ads, but they do have a larger impact on the attitudes of individuals towards gaming as a whole, which is good (unless your boss catches you).

PC gaming doesn't make as much money because it doesn't have the brands. SC, Warcraft, Diablo... are all Blizzard IPs. Sim____. Half-Life. Quake. Unreal. The last three all overlap, as do the first three (though in a very different way). C&C isn't the brand it could have been and isn't just a PC game. I played GTA and GTA:London at my friend's house cause his older brother bought them for us. We loved them. They aren't PC games anymore. The PC version comes out, but its an afterthought. They can't make money because they need to create a brand. Consoles help because they have fanboys rooting for them and lauding any average game and because the console company actually advertises for them.

Avatar image for glorious_blue
glorious_blue

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 glorious_blue
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
I love Kotor. I will love Mass Effect. I love single player Madden. Let it live!
Avatar image for glorious_blue
glorious_blue

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 glorious_blue
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
yeah, there can be a difference between online and 1 player. but MP2 is a listed multiplayer, and this one isn't. But the MP2 multiplayer was pretty forgetable so I online doesn't seem like such a big deal.
Avatar image for glorious_blue
glorious_blue

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 glorious_blue
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
I'd like to see a non-first-party RPG. I'd like to see Bioware get out there and make a wii game! Can you imagine the company that made knights of the old republic and neverwinter nights making a true wii game? Now THAT would revolutionize.
Avatar image for glorious_blue
glorious_blue

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 glorious_blue
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

The new AI tinfo that's come out today has been sweeeeet. Teamvision will actually let us make moves in space and into space. IT would be beautiful to be able to actually make a move that, you know, gets you somewhere.

But where are my licensed teams? AAAAAAAa, more info!

  • 15 results
  • 1
  • 2