a link from where? the human eye can see gears of war has more normal mapping/parallax/bump maps. the textures have more depth the models have more depth. Full support for seamlessly interconnected indoor and outdoor environments with dynamic per-pixel lighting and shadowing supported everywhere http://www.unrealtechnology.com/features.php?ref=rendering Detailed character lighting, using spherical harmonics to composite the light environment and support large numbers of affecting lights at near constant rendering cost. Advanced shadowing, providing full support for four shadowing techniques: Dynamic stencil shadow volumes supporting fully dynamic, moving light sources casting accurate shadows on all objects in the scene. Dynamic characters casting dynamic soft shadows on the scene using projected shadow buffers. Multiple shadow filtering methods are supported including uniform PCF, jittered PCF and VSM. Filtering methods support varying quality settings and are optimized to take advantage of platform-specific features. lol in other words, gears of war lighting could of all been dynamic, but not all lightsources are because it was design choice.
eye's tell the truth, the teeth on killzone2 models look like 2d paper cut out sprites lolMr_Apple_Soup
THE TEETH?
THE....TEETH?
well guys, there you have it, GeoW2 has better teeth then KZ2, not better textures, better lighting, better graphics...better teeth
this thread is getting a bit...stupid now...the general agreement is that KZ2 has better graphics...cant we just move on, or do we really need a 300+ post thread on this EVERY OTHER DAY?...
...the teeth :x
nah, dynamic lighting has already been done in the past, but craploads of normal maps,bump,parallax is what makes a next gen game. anyone who knows anything about graphics knows gears of war uses more, it's overall more next gen. while killzone2 has dynamic lights lol already done fear original, doom3?, doesnt have as much bump,parallax ,normal maps.
Log in to comment