Good_Coop89's comments

Avatar image for good_coop89
Good_Coop89

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@videogameninja: Hopefully this season will be available on disc. I missed out on season 3 because of it's download-only approach. Damn shame - no game has made man tears run down my face like Walking Dead Seasons 1 & 2 did!

Avatar image for good_coop89
Good_Coop89

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@asnakeneverdies: I still think Blood Money is the better game to be honest. Being instantly recognized as an intruder by certain npcs without any way of knowing which npcs had that power ruined the Ai for me, as I like to play without all the UI stuff floating about in the world. As it is, Hitman 2016 feels like it was designed to be played with the extra help on - the floating dots above npcs heads and stuff.

Avatar image for good_coop89
Good_Coop89

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Good_Coop89

@gamingdevil800: I waited for the "complete first season" disc. As a fan of the series since Hitman 2, I feel the way you can just choose missions at any time kills any sense of progression, as fun as the missions are. Feels kinda pointless. You do a mission, unlock some stuff, so you can... Do it again? I'd much rather they bring in an (IN-GAME) economy like in Blood Money and C47, also the notoriety system, flesh that stuff out more, let us choose missions as they come up like emails for side missions in Mass Effect 1-3, or something like that. Not just "Here's the menu, off you go."

I assume that's just me though :(

Avatar image for good_coop89
Good_Coop89

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@jesterofbass: Don't worry - you're not the only one.

Avatar image for good_coop89
Good_Coop89

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@reviewlies: I would say it depends on the game.

Avatar image for good_coop89
Good_Coop89

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Avatar image for good_coop89
Good_Coop89

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Hmm... If it was just mulitplayer crap I wouldn't mind since I don't touch that anymore, but actual missions and stuff? Come on Rockstar, that's not cricket.

Avatar image for good_coop89
Good_Coop89

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Eugh! I don't envy you having to play this one. Poor Justin!

Avatar image for good_coop89
Good_Coop89

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

I love Fallout, and I'll probably get this if it's not ruined by some online multiplayer shit, but in all honesty the open-world game that really has my attention is The Sinking City. That's probably a bit more niche though.

Avatar image for good_coop89
Good_Coop89

431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

5

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@dannybuchanan5: I don't think it's true that realism has never mattered to be honest. Concessions have been made, sure, for quality of life reasons for example, or (most commonly) dumbing down to appeal to larger demographics. But to say realism has never mattered is a bit of an overstatement - no offence.