Another example of "How to deal with a real situation that put at least one of my moral code at risk in any outcome I could go for ", good luck with that.
From the answers I read, there seems to have no problem taking the child without the mother. I haven't read the text so I don't know if there's a relative that could take the child and I don't even know how old is the child but taking a child to its parent due to their ideology and not the treatment to the said child is a paternalistic move that disturb me (but I recall the end of Pan's Labyrinth being a "good choice" from the rebels... but in that case, the mother wasn't supporting the regime, only the father so... ). The picture of taking a child to it's mother and telling "we know better than you how to raise your kid" should be more problematic than what it appears in the comments. Even tho I agree that it's highly more defensible in this case. But without a relative, I'd like to get your attention on what oftenly happens to kids in host families.
And for other issues, even if the kid is not to blame in terms of rights and moral, it doesn't change it potential brainwashed behavior (once again, if he's more than something like 2) , I remember a surrealist video of one young child brainwashed that cried until he had a video of beheaded people.
Log in to comment