[QUOTE="hobojoe82"]

yes i can understand wot your sayin and you have very valid points.i have never played the 1st fallouts so i wouldnt know about that. you still havent said which you prefer though?

kieranb2000

yeah i agree with you there, all though at 1st i was like "wow this is a different way of shooting". But then it just got dull.

yes i can understand wot your sayin and you have very valid points.i have never played the 1st fallouts so i wouldnt know about that. you still havent said which you prefer though?

by brutal i mean violent. and post apocolyptic style i said, asin how it looks and feels whilst playing it.

[QUOTE="hobojoe82"]

gotta admit these games are very similar......but for some reason i couldnt get into Fallout like ive got into Borderlands...anyone else feel the same here?

kieranb2000

i dont understand how you dont find em similar? both FPS, both RPGs, both post apocolyptic style worlds, both brutal?

I know Oblivion is a hack and slash RPG, but as an actual rpg it still wins over both imo

i played fallout 3 and i gotta say it's a great single player experiance, especially DLCs. I'm getting Borderlands this friday, maybe single player is not as great like in Fallout 3, but the multiplayer is fun and very addictive. =]

nocturial

ths singleplayer in borderlands is still amazin. though, i played BLs online dependin what mood i was in i think. if i didnt want to rush, i played single, and if i wasnt assed i played online.

not sayin it was aaaaawful. i expected to love it cos i love bethesda games. you should try borderlands though if you did.

gotta admit these games are very similar......but for some reason i couldnt get into Fallout like ive got into Borderlands...anyone else feel the same here?

Oblivion, definately. Better fighting style, good for just wandering round aimlessly, better story, no cheeseyness, no cut scenes, no **** I lost interest in witcher within a couple of hours. Oblivion, i am still playing, and always will.