Should we have own category's for graphics? Gameplay / pre-rendered cutscene / real time cutscene

because this is getting ridiculous

@ZombieKiller7 said:

@GoldenElementXL said:

Weren't we told by hermits that the performance would improve after the beta? Here we are at launch and a 980Ti and a i7 4790 can't hit a steady 60fps at 1080p maxed. A Titan X at 41.1 at 1440p? Wow....................

Dafuq?

So "The Division" runs on Xbox One on par with a GTX960?

I have a GTX960 lol

Max settings vs console settings, so no

considering how much we know about the game it can be anything between a turd and greatest game of all time

fantasy mostly

ye ok, superior is the synonym to sucking these days

and on topic screw from if this is true, I bared Bloodborne already, rather not have it for ds3

but as it is the same engine as bloodborne, it wouldn't be too surprising if the game actually breaks at over 30fps

they put out great games but they are awful on the technical side

and the game has been shown to run on 60fps:

as interested as I'm on all telltale games, none what so ever

@horgen: Titan X

here's the link:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2016-is-it-finally-time-to-upgrade-your-core-i5-2500k

It's not rocket science and naturally google gives you very step by step guides.

As the recent digital foundry article about old 2500k's showed that the difference between 4.5ghz 2500k with 1600mhz ram vs 2133mhz is f.e in witcher 3 72.8fps vs 86.4fps so the gains aren't insignificant

Looks great, played the crap out of warbands

Microsoft pretty much 2 options, they make the UWP good for the players or they pay every AAA dev to release their games exclusively on UWP

Having bad platform with only handful of desirable titles isn't going to fly