huangzhihao's forum posts

Avatar image for huangzhihao
huangzhihao

289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#1 huangzhihao
Member since 2005 • 289 Posts
Steam isn't too bad after you get to used to it. You will need it to install and update your game anyways, unless you want to spend a tons of time searching for new cracked updates and having your anti virus warning you all the time.
Avatar image for huangzhihao
huangzhihao

289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#2 huangzhihao
Member since 2005 • 289 Posts

[QUOTE="huangzhihao"]

[QUOTE="SipahSalar"]

And what about the game do you find "nowhere close to being realistic"? And which games are more realistic compared to WAB? I'd like to know.

Iffy350

Ultra realistic games like IL-2 sturmovik 1946, silent hunter 4... aren't easy to play. WAB is fun for people don't want extreme realism.

Speak for yourself. I find Il-2 to be an easy game. I picked it up and learned how to play it in an afternoon.

Sure, under 100% realism? your average score every mission? ever tried online against Human players? Anyways, boasting about your intelligence or skill doesn't make youur argument any more...convincing. Actually, it's the other way around. Wait, I shouldn't even be posting, you are probably trolling around with your own post.

Avatar image for huangzhihao
huangzhihao

289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#3 huangzhihao
Member since 2005 • 289 Posts

And what about the game do you find "nowhere close to being realistic"? And which games are more realistic compared to WAB? I'd like to know.

SipahSalar

You obviously haven't played games such as Achtung Panzer: Kharkov 1943, "threatre of war" series... any Simulator fan knows WAB isn't a simulator game, and it's realism level is very limited. Ultra realistic games like IL-2 sturmovik 1946, silent hunter 4... aren't easy to play. WAB is fun for people don't want extreme realism.

Avatar image for huangzhihao
huangzhihao

289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#4 huangzhihao
Member since 2005 • 289 Posts
I'm a huge realism fan and have played a lot of simulator games. So, to me, this game is no where close to being realistic; however, if you compare this to WIC, it IS more real and tactical. Although still a bit arcady, WAB is slower paced, has bigger maps, and does require you to plan out your moves( Recon is cruicial )
Avatar image for huangzhihao
huangzhihao

289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#5 huangzhihao
Member since 2005 • 289 Posts
yea. totally agree, C&C 3 is a joke comepare to other good RTS. little deepth, out-of-scale units, lack of realism. People now days really have no taste of what's a good game. This one really makes me think that GS is recieving benefits from EA to do that.