hybridmoments12's forum posts

  • 17 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for hybridmoments12
hybridmoments12

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 hybridmoments12
Member since 2004 • 68 Posts
They are in 1.6.  They decided to put the ads in 1.6 instead of source because they know that 1.6 is a more popular game and it has much more play time than source does.  Also because they have seemed to stop caring about anything in 1.6...a new patch hasn't come out in years and yet they can take the time to put ads all over the walls.  Valve needs to shape up a bit.
Avatar image for hybridmoments12
hybridmoments12

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 hybridmoments12
Member since 2004 • 68 Posts
counterstrike 1.6>bf2>>>cs:snazaric
This guy just hit it spot on.
Avatar image for hybridmoments12
hybridmoments12

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 hybridmoments12
Member since 2004 • 68 Posts

Well, first off they are both great games, and there is no point of getting either if you dont have online

It really depends on what type you want to play

If you want to play more realistic, hugely modded, less buggy game then get CSS

If you want one that has vehicles, planes, etc, and huge maps,less realistic, though you may have to endure quite a few bad glitches then get BF2, also it is reccomended that you find one good server with nice and fair admin or else you will just get lots of people that will ruin the game.

Somebean
Obviously you don't play battlefield 2 or source or you wouldn't be saying Source is realistic. Source is a good game, don't get me wrong, but it is the furthest thing from realism. Also, all those "facts" you are saying about less realism, bad glitches, and bad admins that "ruin the game"...well lets just say NONE of them are true. Most if not all of the glitches have been fixed and I haven't run across a bad admin once in my playing, and I have been playing since release.
Avatar image for hybridmoments12
hybridmoments12

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 hybridmoments12
Member since 2004 • 68 Posts
Yeah it sucks by todays standereds play HL2StarFoxCOM
Please go play your consoles. You have no idea what true FPS are about.
Avatar image for hybridmoments12
hybridmoments12

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 hybridmoments12
Member since 2004 • 68 Posts
There is barely any of the original developers who worked on Starcraft and Diablo still on the team, so the likely ness of them ruining the Starcraft name is very high.  You can't really improve on something that was already too good.
Avatar image for hybridmoments12
hybridmoments12

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 hybridmoments12
Member since 2004 • 68 Posts
Even if Blizzard did announce that, who says that they won't mess up the next Starcraft 2 or Diablo 3 with no original devs on the team.  They may take the original idea behind the games and wipe it clear and try to make it "new and interesting, next generation maybe".  I mean, I'd be happy with an original remake of Starcraft with better graphics, with same everything.  Not saying that I don't want anything new to come around, but I dont want them to make a bad remake of the perfect game.  It's kind of hard to make something better than perfect, there is no increasing the greatness of those 2 games.
Avatar image for hybridmoments12
hybridmoments12

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 hybridmoments12
Member since 2004 • 68 Posts
I know Prey was an absolutely horrendous game, but from what I did play of it, I think when they were playing Baracuda by Heart during the scene where the bar gets ripped apart is sick.  It just added so much to that part of the game.  Then it was a downward spiral into hell
Avatar image for hybridmoments12
hybridmoments12

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 hybridmoments12
Member since 2004 • 68 Posts
If you have your PhD you should know how to spell right?
Avatar image for hybridmoments12
hybridmoments12

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 hybridmoments12
Member since 2004 • 68 Posts
Just hope to god EA doesn't scar a game that Westwood put such a good name on.  Believe me I am hyped, seeing that I own every Command and Conquer game that was ever released, and this one looks awesome.  It's just been such a long time since one has been released I don't want to get all hyped up and then be let down.  We Shall See...
Avatar image for hybridmoments12
hybridmoments12

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 hybridmoments12
Member since 2004 • 68 Posts
personaly i wouldnt, it is fun with gadgets and all but not what you think it would be. The graphics look worse than BF2 and its just BF2 with people on grappling hooks.Sully28
I think either you need to get your eyes checked out or your video card is horrid, because the special forces graphics are better on my rig with a 7800gtx. They are not like OH MY GOD better graphics but there are some things you notice.
  • 17 results
  • 1
  • 2