Its clear that GS (this isnt only aimed at GS but any other popular game sites) most of been paid to put Red Dead Redemption forward for so many awards this year. It really doesn't take much to see that they are biased. I say this because I just tried to read through the nominees in the varius categories to see what games i missed and if i should make a pass at them since im on holiday from work this week.
But it seems to me that game review mediums are totally here to spin the hype wheel for games. How many previews do you read of 'this game is set to be amazing'how many after playing preview code have you heard 'this is such a wonderful game' only to get 6/10 in reviews and insults about the game mechanics or lack of etc (does anyone rememebr the review of 'Majin and the forsaken kingdom' for which the summary now reads "Simplistic combat and tedious backtracking don't fully diminish the pleasures of this attractive and festive fable.").
It seems more and more clear that the point of GS is to create hype for games so we buy them. They most be paid for advertising/ articles that they write.
An body else see this or am i just disillusioned? Anyway what do i know right? :-/
Log in to comment