I'm pretty sure anyone who played Gears 2 can vouch that there will be a third game. And a prequel would make sense, considering how much they talk about event you never got to play, but that's something far in the future...I'm pretty secure in saying they started developing Gears 3 while Gears 2 was being developed, or at least are starting soon. 

The other possiblity is that they are working on patching right now and nothing is being developed other than online stuff. Who knows except epic? 

Golden sun 1 and 2 are probably on my top 5 games list, i ussually take out and beat them at least once a year. A second one seems highly plausible, even with the gap, and who knows what they've been doing these past years? maybe arguing between Golden Sun and Shining Force...who knows.

But those sports games...seems counter-intuitive...its a game...of doing somthing u can do already...i like games to give me some idea of fantasy, story, and somthing that is otherwise impossible. That is why these games are awesome, they have realistic people, with awesome powers (but not to the point that u are invincible). It was great at holding suspense and making u wish to god u culd go faster to figure out what was happening. And its just bloody brilliant witht eh graphics too, especially the fire and lightning, and JUDGEMENT! that is the coolest thing possibly that i've ever seen in a game, better than any Final Fantasy summoning, and these games were superiour to FF in my opinion too. i've gotten more replay value out of them than all like..15 FF games.

[QUOTE="7CloudStrife7"][QUOTE="brujagio"][QUOTE="7CloudStrife7"]If people did this the video game industry would crash due to lack of sales, bad idea.brujagio

Read. He's not suggesting returning a game for a full refund, he's simply pointing out that some people buy games, don't complete them, and buy more.

Yea I know how to read, and I did read it. If people only bought 1 game for every game they beat, the industry would go under, whats so hard to understand about that?

For some reason, I highly doubt that. Unfortunately I've got no evidence to back it up, then again I'm sure you don't either.

See, the reason is, because if this was some kind of rule, unspoken or real (how would it become rule? idk, hypothetical) then alot of people would stop buying games, because they may not ever want to or be able to finish one. If a game bores you, then maybe u should put it down for a while and come back. Some games that u can bea thte story line but only did like half of it, if u dont want to finish the extras...dont!

i get games two times a year and alot of games at a time (except a few games i just HAVE to have), and play one console and one handhold ussually, until one is beaten then i get a new one. But sometimes one bores me...so i put it away and play it in a few months, there's no problem with that. You don't have to beat a game, as long as it entertains you, its worth the money.

Anyway, its a good point he made, that would end the gaming industry, but also...if u like games, but never beat ones u get, then get shorter games (*cough cough halo 3* [dont get me wrong, i like it, just short]) or get easier games, just a waste of cash then. so i agree with parts of the main topic, and with Cloud.

Anways, games are about fun! have some when u play them! (sorry about the rant)