idontknow1110's forum posts

Avatar image for idontknow1110
idontknow1110

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 idontknow1110
Member since 2003 • 129 Posts
if u want to know how good the single player part is, just read the review. No need for seperate scores.
Avatar image for idontknow1110
idontknow1110

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 idontknow1110
Member since 2003 • 129 Posts

Does this game work for the 360? I've heard of issues about the game freezing on the fifth chapter.TKandPBC

I just beat the game on the 360 and it worked perfectly fine for me.

Avatar image for idontknow1110
idontknow1110

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 idontknow1110
Member since 2003 • 129 Posts
Unless it is striving to be a scary or dark (I don't mean the color being dark) game, colorful is better. I want tree leaves to actually be green, not brown.
Avatar image for idontknow1110
idontknow1110

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 idontknow1110
Member since 2003 • 129 Posts
toss up between 360 and ps3, but I guess ps3 gets my vote only cause it costs more.
Avatar image for idontknow1110
idontknow1110

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 idontknow1110
Member since 2003 • 129 Posts
[QUOTE="whoisryanmack"]

[QUOTE="MikeE21286"]$350 is actually not low to people.xDonRobx

when 600 is the alternative, 350 is low

You mean a $500 multimedia powerhouse compared to a $350 that plays only games?

You talk about casuals and how that is too much. If they are casuals, chances are they arent going to care about something like Mass Effect or Bioshock. Halo yes, but none of the other anticipated titles that 360 owners are wanting. Added Blu-Ray only appeals more to casuals.

casuals probably don't care about Mass Effect or Bioshock. I don't see how Blu-ray appeals to casuals (unless it cost the same as the 360, which it doesn't).

Avatar image for idontknow1110
idontknow1110

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 idontknow1110
Member since 2003 • 129 Posts
dvd players have that button too on the remote.
Avatar image for idontknow1110
idontknow1110

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 idontknow1110
Member since 2003 • 129 Posts

thats not a valid point....

so...if blu-ray players were $9000 and the ps3 was $7000 would it be worth it....

Avatar image for idontknow1110
idontknow1110

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 idontknow1110
Member since 2003 • 129 Posts
when someone thinks their opinion is the right one. Something along the lines of "are you kidding ____ (insert game here) sucks!."
Avatar image for idontknow1110
idontknow1110

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 idontknow1110
Member since 2003 • 129 Posts

[QUOTE="idontknow1110"][QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="idontknow1110"][QUOTE="tidus222"]

i payed 600 for a ps3 LOL

i dont see why people have this stigma about paying 600 for a console

meanwhile tons of people pay 600 for a stupid IPHONE

the ps3 at 600 dollars is a much better bargain than the WII at 250

wii doesnt even play DVD's or have HD capabilities LOL

and xbox360 premium you had to buy an add on for HD-DVD and buy a new elite model for HDMI

overall ps3 is the much better bargain even though it costs the most

ArisShadows

its a good bargain for those who want hi-def movies, for those who don't, not so much.

600 to watch movies is too much for me too...600 for games same... and both... still too much, though I can see why some people go for it... it's not bad for what your getting.

Yea since the prices of hi-def disc players are really high. Paying 300-500 just to watch HDDVD/Blu-ray (and then 30 dollars per disc) is way too much.

Why are damage controlling thePS3, when it just a simple question "how much will you pay for 'a' system? Its like you need to keep reminding yourself that it was okay to pay 600 dollars.

I don't even have a ps3. I was trying to say that the high costs of hi-def disc players contribute to the high cost of the ps3 and its not worth it to pay that much to watch movies.

Avatar image for idontknow1110
idontknow1110

129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 idontknow1110
Member since 2003 • 129 Posts
[QUOTE="idontknow1110"][QUOTE="tidus222"]

i payed 600 for a ps3 LOL

i dont see why people have this stigma about paying 600 for a console

meanwhile tons of people pay 600 for a stupid IPHONE

the ps3 at 600 dollars is a much better bargain than the WII at 250

wii doesnt even play DVD's or have HD capabilities LOL

and xbox360 premium you had to buy an add on for HD-DVD and buy a new elite model for HDMI

overall ps3 is the much better bargain even though it costs the most

GundamGuy0

its a good bargain for those who want hi-def movies, for those who don't, not so much.

600 to watch movies is too much for me too...600 for games same... and both... still too much, though I can see why some people go for it... it's not bad for what your getting.

Yea since the prices of hi-def disc players are really high. Paying 300-500 just to watch HDDVD/Blu-ray (and then 30 dollars per disc) is way too much.