OH and for the record, 100% can be achieved. If you take a math test and get all the answers right and you score a 100. You have a perfect paper. There are very few things where perfect can be achieved. Math fortunately is one of the things that you cant dispute if its perfect or not. there are many different ways to get 1 answer thats correct. to get an answer of 4 there are about half a million different things you can do and be perfect or 100% correct about it. for example 2+2=4, 2 squared is 4, 8 divided by 2 is 4, 2x2=4, 100 divided by 25 is 4. those are all correct and in no way are not perfect. :)
To get widespread 10s games need massive amounts of hype behind them, and even that doesn't always guarantee a perfect score. GTAIV got a 10 largely on hype that glossed over its flaws, and gushing praise over ruled common sense. For PC games one of the main problems stopping games getting a 10 is technical problems. How many games have you played in the last year that hasn't had technical problems for you? Online activation, DRM, install limits, patches, driver updates, hotfixes etc. - it is now as much a part of PC gaming as actually playing the games, and certainly detracts from the fun. PC games are also marked on a different standard from console games. Where a console game will get praised for its wonderful graphics, the same standard on a PC would get mocked for looking awful. A PC game has to look stunning on a massive resolution to please the graphics nuts, but then instantly puts off people that want deeper gaming thinking you can't have stunning graphics AND great gameplay in the same package. It's almost as if everyone is waiting to pick a part of the game for criticism rather than enjoying what it isAvenger1324
Thats Very true. about 95% of people that look at games look at one specific peice and then judge it that way. While its a known fact that a console can only have a certain graphic performance. To create a game it runs through a computer meaning the computer has such a higher expectation for graphics automatically. Because you always expect that the master is better then the student per say. If we could get the critics to rate the game without having a bias for graphics or deep gameplay you would definately have some titles that would be 10. The day a PC game gets a 10 is when People who think graphics are what make a game and people who think good gameplay make a good game settle on a agreement somewhere in the middle.
Who believes that there should be a limit to your units while playing command and conquer? I think it limits the players ability because if you have played C&C Generals and the expansion Zero Hour there was no limit to the units you were able to create and it gave players the oppertunity to use more strategies then if you had a 50 unit limit or something like that. Honestly i believe they limit that to reduce lag in the game but i say that any good C&C Skirmish you play with good people should take more then 1 hour. I hope they make more games like generals because of selection of units and the choice of powers you had. I saw in Red alert 3 they introduced this again. Im sure they will put that in Red Alert 3 Uprising. Generals had more freedom then it does in Red Alert 3. What do you guys think? Should they remove a limit to units or should they keep it? Thanks :D
For an RTS i would go for Command and Conquer. An Rpg i would go for Warcraft III. And for an MMORPG i like WoW. ive been looking at guild wars and D&D. do you think its worth getting Guild wars or D&D?
Guys im talking about the 360, the wii, and the ps3. they haventmade any new recent games for any of them. they just recreated an older game for the 360. i have not seen any new releases since then for any console since the xbox a while back.
Who knows what happened to castlevania? I havent seen a game in development for a long time. Do you think the Castlevania Franchise is at an end? or are they just giving up?
Log in to comment