jeremylst1's comments

Avatar image for jeremylst1
jeremylst1

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

I look forward to this final installment. Also I am glad they will not make any more lorewise. Dark souls was (storywise) the best game I ever played. Praise the sun!

Avatar image for jeremylst1
jeremylst1

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

Edited By jeremylst1

Ads in games....another dark path they want to send us on to. Sigh, when will these corporate misbehavings no longer stand?

Avatar image for jeremylst1
jeremylst1

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

Edited By jeremylst1

The souls series will always stirr some controversy, I even myself am highly divided which category dark souls really is. Is it actually a game?

My best guess is, its in a league of its own. And its lonely at the top aswell as playing the game.

Avatar image for jeremylst1
jeremylst1

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

Edited By jeremylst1

A remake of gk3 is a welcome idea as well. I realy enjoyed it and its amazing story, but the graphics are horrid.



Avatar image for jeremylst1
jeremylst1

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

While I do agree that hacking a multiplayergame is cheating, some multiplatforms have the battle mechanics of a pyramid scheme. They are ridicously complicated, but you're promised more "value" if you just keep subcribing to them.

Avatar image for jeremylst1
jeremylst1

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

Edited By jeremylst1

death by snu snu > xbox one

Avatar image for jeremylst1
jeremylst1

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

Every person has a right to protect what he or she considers his or her intellectual property. It's just not a guarantee you get more profit from it.

Avatar image for jeremylst1
jeremylst1

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

There comes a point where its impossible to tell the difference between digital and real.

Still, the best way for people to approve or dissaprove certain aspects of a market is through their wallets, a.k.a consumer vigilance, instead relying on some flakey government institute to take the danger out of a flame. (Studies show that companies who lose money change their strategy, those who gain government support don't.)

But to me the whole violence debate in videogames is missing a very important issue. The most concerning thing about games or any other form of recreational substance, is it's addictive nature.

In the end you can take all the violence out of all of the games, it will still have addicting aspects with all its negative side-effects that come with it.



Avatar image for jeremylst1
jeremylst1

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

Edited By jeremylst1

Those pesky peasants...



Avatar image for jeremylst1
jeremylst1

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

Edited By jeremylst1

Destigmatizing mental health threatment? Really?

Killing sprees under the influence of perscription anti-psychotics need destigmatization?

Really!?

Acknowledging the (mortal) risks of substance (ab)use
is what free choice is all about.
Games included.

Yet, when it comes to government approved substances,
all this risk is expected to be exhiled to the land of superstition.