@Ace9590 @theonlylolking i will agree that for a portable game the graphics are good but for a PS Vita title they could have done better. Unit 13 and Wipe out 2048 have much better textures with high polygon counts. Graphics aside I am enjoying the single player before I try multi player. from what I'm getting and comparing it to other portable games out there the game as a whole could have been done much better.
@ jurassic1024 I am in no way an AMD fan. When I said the article was biased. I was referring to the idea that the writer was trying to put the new proc. in a good position and make it seem like a reasonable option for a CPU. I'm wasn't saying for the guy to clock the Intel proc back to its stock freq. but to compare the Latest from AMD to the latest from Intel.
Ok this is the kind of biased crap that really annoys the hell out of me! they take a 2yo processor and underclock it to the same freq of an intel thats using a highly improved core. can you say gimped!? on top of that, whats up with the whole "total cost of ownership" crap? Most people who would even think to get the lastest from AMD or Intel usualy get almost all new hardware to fully take advantage of the NEW "highend" parts. wow and AM2+ MoBo can be bought for $50! congrats on ur POS PCB dude! even GOOD AMD based boards don't start till about $130. same with intel boards. "It keeps up gaming-wise with Intel's Core lineup and holds its own in intense processing situations." Ya keeps up with old hardware. how about testing it with something that came out within the last 4 months from Intel, then tell me if it keeps up and can hold its own.(not likely) DAMN talk about biased.
jetman36's comments