For a game console back then,that was RIDICULOUS! But,if its a cool console,it dosen't matter how much money it is.
jgiscool's forum posts
I talking about games like Red dead Redemption,Grand theft auto,etc.And if you say Grand Theft auto for example,please tell me which game of the series you like the best.
Dude,Xbox Livewould be like extremely hard to "attack",now on the other hand ps3......not so much
:question:I think that the game is OK.I think its dumb they made the money for the multiplayer though.........my favorite gun is the famas what about U?
I definetly agree..........I play at least 10 times more multi player but if the campaign sucks I'm not going to be very impressed by the game.I thought the idea behind Homefront had a lot of potential and expected that potential to be mostly wasted. From what I've heard so far I was right. I heard the campaign was around 5 hours, and I remember a long time ago the developer said there would be a cliffhanger ending that would be resolved in DLC or a sequel. Really? It's a new IP and they're banking on it being popular enough to resolve the (insultingly short) campaign in DLC/a sequel? Why not resolve it in the first game to make it a full-length game? Then maybe it will actually sell well enough to get a sequel. This campaign-extension DLC thing is getting out of hand. Call of Duty may be able to get away with a five-hour campaign because it has a well established fanbase and everyone knows CoD is all about multiplayer anyway. For a new IP to try the same is pretty cocky (or stupid).
Who actually cares about the campaign in shooters? I do, that's why Half-Life 2, Halo:CE and Halo 3 are a few of my favorites. Half-Life is all about the campaign. I've heard the multiplayer in Halo:CE was added as an afterthought. By the time Halo 3 came out multiplayer was the driving force behind the series, but it still fit in a great campaign, which BTW was a lot longer than 5 hours.
INF1DEL
I own the duel combination of duck hunt and super mario bros for NES.I also own the paper mario for the n64.:)
DSI and DSI XL are pretty much the same things. The DSI XL is just larger and they can both play the same games. I own the DS Lite im doing just fine with it but if you want all the special features like the camera,web browsing(which i've heard is nothing special).I would get the DSI XL just because it has more space for your stylus.:D Hope this helped
Nintendo can almost most likely fix it...I would just send it to them.:D
I'm not getting the xbox 360 slim because i've already have stored a MASSIVE amount of data and other things on my ''old'' xbox 360. and also because i have the old hardrive and i don't feel like paying another 50-70 dollars for a new hardrive so for me it's a better value for me to keep my old one but i can fully understand why someone would want to get the slim.
Ironic...I have a pc wii and xbox 360 :|
Log in to comment