News Flash! So far, a total of four people already broke the only thread rule, making the current score 4-0.
While we wait for more relevant and informative posts, here's a quick 'n' rough list of potentially interesting titles all released in the past 12-or-so months which GameSpot failed to review (it's assumable they had their hands full with the latest Call Of Duty instalments and friends):
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/pride-of-nations/index.html
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/magicthegatheringtactics/index.html
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/shiningforce/index.html
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/greedcorp/index.html
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/ageofconquestiii/index.html
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/guardiansofgraxia/index.html
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/grotesquetacticsevilheroes/index.html
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/delvedeeper/index.html
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/heroesofmightandmagickingdoms/index.html
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/legio/index.html
Now, it's quite possible that some of the above titles are turds, while others possibly good games. But here at GameSpot we wouldn't know. No wonder the general public only knows and plays Call Of Duty and friends, if they depend on major sites like this one to give them reviews and information about games such as the above ones - anything different, or with actual quality gameplay instead of mere eye candy, or original, or not-from-a-major-software-house, or simply mature and intelligent.
Hence, this thread's request for information. But please - ONLY if you know the score.
Log in to comment