@ievro I've heard that it's cheaper and easier to develop high-res games on the 360, much easier than on the PS3, therefor you don't use the PS3's full capacity for playing regular games. Most PS3 exclusives have great graphics, because then they just MAX out the graphics, because they don't have to care about anything than the PS3. I'd like to see some exclusive games compete, now that'd be interesting. :)
Also, I don't think it's a good thing to let a third party do these comparisons, everything in the game can fact into how the sceenies will look. If the devs themselves would do it, they could make sure that both of the shots, for example, did or did not have a gust in the middle of the screen, making it look like the graphics isn't as good, but it's really just a gust of sand. When we're looking on the shots as close as we are here, things like that does come into play.
It's one thing to be biased, but it's a whole other thing to be downright stupid. :P As I said before, if this makes of breaks what console you'll get, you really need to wake up.
Sheesh, who cares? The difference is so small, it's nearly not a difference at all. If this actually is what you look at when deciding what console to buy, you need to get a punch in the face to wake up, and see how similar they actually are. and zaero_a, not fake. Go back under your rock.
@DatBoy56 To my untrained eye, it seems like it's the PC, X360 then PS3... On the last comparison PS3 had far better graphics on the PS3 exclusives, though on the multiplatform games it seemed like the X360 was better. Don't get me wrong, I love both PS3 and the 360, but that was the way it seemed to me..
Seriously, why do you have to be either Xbox 360 or PS3 nerd? Can't you like both? I own a 360, and my friend have a PS3, we often talk about games that we have but never like "My has better graphics on that game" but more of how the games are, and how the feel are. Just stop with being fanboys already.
join993's comments