@jenovaschilld: Frankly, neither console shines as a game platform. Graphically, both are wildly underpowered. A $50 graphics chip embedded in the system would have absolutely blew the the other system out of the competition. Why did Both SONY and MS go with such poor hardware?

Less than 100 comments here, over 14 THOUSAND on IGN ( Where the fanboys hang out). I bet GameSpot would like to have that many click thrus tho.

@westsiderz28 I downloaded the entire 23GB Sunset Overdrive demo in 21 minutes and 39 seconds. Not exactly pokey. I donno who came up with this idea that the XBox One is slow in downloading as mine rips. I was putting onto a 3TB seagate hard drive in a USB 3.0 enclosure tho.

@Vexov Week ending Nov 29th, North America 759,655 XBox Ones sold, while 592,245 PS4s sold. Good enough?

@AzureBonds76 Neither console covered itself with glory as for the graphics engine. 1080P at 30 FPS? A $50 graphics chip add on could have doubled this pathetic amount of graphics power. This was a race to the bottom for keeping costs low rather than adding true value to these "new" consoles.

@garyhove Go to VGChartz. I consider their data to be questionable but the proportions seem to fit.

If I am going to look at an Elf's ass for hours on end in World of Warcraft, it might as well be a cute one.

Like all of the Civ games, I expect the gameplay to be tweaked to hell and gone over the coming months/years. After two or three major updates, most of the weaknesses will be addressed and fixed. You still have to go by what is shipped for a review, I get that. Just don't expect that cities will be a pushover for long or that someone will not fix this in a mod. Civ 5 plays a lot more differently now than when it shipped.