A RUNDOWN OF THE SERIES FINALE

Apparently there was actually some literal significance to the show's title brought to light in the series finale of the US version, unlike the wrap-up of the UK show. But part of me can't help but be a little apprehensive of whether the writers took the title a little too seriously (read: literally).

I was initially attracted to Life on Mars because I've always been a fan of time travel shows like Journeyman and Quantum Leap because it makes one question the way the timeline of life is supposed to work. On the other hand, I've never really been a huge fan of the low-budget science-fiction films that portrayed space trips to Mars. And that's what this ending exuded for me. While I applaud the writers for attempting to make the major plot line(s) of the show—mostly from 1973—make sense, it still escapes me as to how we, as innocent viewers, are supposed to make sense of the rest of Sam's visions/dreams/stimulations.

I find particularly bothersome, still-unanswered questions in the following:

- Who was Maya? If 1973-Sam's detective crew were 2035-Sam's spaceship crew, where did the people in 2008 come from?

- Why did Sam have to save his 1973 self before he could wake up? I mean, technically if he's in his late 30's in 2035, he wouldn't have even existed in 1973… And I'm chalking up the question of how he even knew what went on in the '70s to 2035-Sam's education's worth of history lessons.

- Why did he have to discover that Annie was "the one"? Don't get me wrong, I love-love-loved Sam & Annie as a couple. So much chemistry and sexual tension! But the kiss upon Sam's discovery that Annie was "the one" kind of lost its sentiment once it was revealed who they all were (astronauts on a mission to Mars). I would have liked to have seen more of a connection between 2035-Sam and 2035-Annie. Were they lovers? Married? What? Other than that quick little glance between them, I saw virtually no connection between the futuristic duo.

Final Thoughts:

- The conclusion of the series finale, "Life is a Rock", made everything that happened in the series finale make sense. Many things outside of the series finale still don't add up.

- Though completely predictable and logical, it would have been much more preferable that they stick to the "Sam's in a coma" twist like the UK series.

- This episode (and probably the other 16) warrants another viewing before attempting to make much more sense of the show I've loved since day one.

- I wish my dreams were as vivid and interesting and fleshed-out as Sam's!

Final Statement:

The Life on Mars series finale was as much of a nonsensical, twisted enigma as David Bowie's lyrics to the song of the same name.

ABC couldn't spot quality television if it kicked them in the groin and slapped them in the face. ABC sent three sophomore shows to the guillotine Thursday for untimely deaths. Now, I never watched Dirty, Sexy Money or Eli Stone, but I'm sure they weren't given the shots they deserved either. It baffles me how the same network that ran According to Jim for seven (7!!) full seasons can cancel three critically acclaimed prime time dramas. Were advertisers refusing to buy slots during the run of these three shows? Or maybe at a significantly lower price than, say, Grey's Anatomy? Get real ABC.

Now, I'm not a believer in resurrecting entities from the dead--I've seen "Practical Magic"--things just turn out worse than before (i.e. Jericho). But, the fact of the matter is, Pushing Daisies isn't dead yet. There's still time to save it. The show has seven episodes of its thirteen left to air. The show's not gone for good just yet. There's still hope. I pray for Lee Pace & co.'s survival in the tv world.

(Un)fortunately, I still have one remaining loyalty to the alphabet network in the form of a show called Life is Mars--to which ABC shows only a little more decency (it's gone until January 28th). In all, I've really given up on network television to produce quality shows anymore. Premium cable is the way to go, folks. HBO and Showtime know their stuff. I guess you only get what you pay for. And for entertainment's sake, it's worth it.

(From my Blogger blog)

The actual concept of "good television" varies from tv-watcher to tv-watcher because we all have different tastes in our preferences, but I think we can all agree on the elements of a good tv show.

On the surface:
Good television...

• has great acting
• has attractive actors
• is well-written
• is creative

But underneath it all:
Good television makes you...

• cry
• laugh
• feel good/better
• put your own life in perspective
• care about characters you've never actually met

Good television...

• entertains
• educates
• inspires
• relates

Still, above all:
Good television is realistic without being "reality".
Good television is controversial without being scandalous.
Good television is informative, yet original.

See, I have this screen name here that I've had since TVTome days, justacsifreak. Anyway, so, okay, maybe when I first signed up with it it may as well have been "csifreakforever"!! And well, CSI was good back then and for the next few years. But, honestly, I haven't watched a single second of a single episode this past season because the end of season...2006-07 (I'm no longer sure what numerical season they're on) kind of...well, really left me completely uninterested in the show (thanks to newer, fresher, slightly cheerier, and much BRIGHTER Grey's Anatomy; and the fact that CSI killed off my love, Liev Schrieber after a far-too-short stay)! Anyway, I guess I'm absolutely stuck with my name which I just try to ignore all together--mostly because I'm too chicken to ask if I can get it changed, for fear of a big, screaming HELL NO! So, in the meantime, I'm just going to try to make my profile page as non-CSI as possible. My current tv show obesession is Grey's, in case you couldn't tell (as if anyone's actually reading this). All in all, I think I've learned my lesson. TV shows are just fads in disguise (for me anyway). I will never be a lifelong fan of anything (except maybe my Astros--but even they're looking doubtful), and therefore, I must, from now on, choose screennames that do not express my love for a specific "fad"...then again, most sites in which screennames are used allow you--and tell you they allow you--to request a name change. In this case, unless an admin reads this and can help me out here, I guess I'm just looking at another case of tough luck. :oops: