k01mx's forum posts

  • 21 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for k01mx
k01mx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 k01mx
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="k01mx"][QUOTE="adamosmaki"] No no you got it wrong. Actually cell out best a HAL 9000. RSX is also about equal to an nvidia gtx 690. It can actually upgrade its self over time to be on par with the best pc gaming has to offer. Also why anyone would get a pc when a PS3 allows me to play at 4K resolution and that is with 3d stereo . jun_aka_pekto

The Cell and RSX are together more powerful than a gaming PC. Alone, a gaming PC can outperform one of those parts, but, when put together, they completely blow it out of the water. Have you seen the leaked screenshots for Killzone 4? They will look better than what Crysis 3 on a GTX 690 has been shown to look like by a long shot.

If the PS3 is really that powerful, why can't PS3 game developers release 1080p versions of the KZ and Uncharted games then? The XMB on my PS3 does 1080p. Why must all my PS3 games drop down to 720p? Look at the gaming PC on my sig. It handles 1080p games just fine. By your reasoning, the PS3 should run rings around my gaming PC with its puny Phenom II X3 720.

the RSX play all games in 1080p no problem, and cell is 100000x times better than Phenom II X3 720.
Avatar image for k01mx
k01mx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 k01mx
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="k01mx"][QUOTE="adamosmaki"] indeed and KZ4 is rumored to be running at 120fps at 1600p. Thats madness. Only on Ps3 and cell is possible. I also heard that they were gonna use 32xAA but they opted only for 16xAA because there were some dropdowns to 110fps and the wanted silky smooth 120fps

stop being an idiot

the funny think is that i dont sound any more idiot than you with the difference i'm just joking yet you seem to believe what you say. So take out the sony glasses realize your precious console has 6-7 year old hardware and can barely play games at 720p and 30fps so its not better than even a low end semi-decent pc with a gpu like a 6770

PCs nowadays still use a x86 architecture, which is more than 30 years old by now. On the other hand, the PS3 Cell-Processor uses a much newer RISC architecture. That means that all tasks will be handled better than general on it since it is that much newer. PS3 hardware is very balanced and is designed to be very balanced for games of all kinds. PCs aren't the same since they are made for a lot of purposes. The PS3 is more game-friendly than an old x86, office-program intensive architecture is.
Avatar image for k01mx
k01mx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 k01mx
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="k01mx"][QUOTE="adamosmaki"] No no you got it wrong. Actually cell out best a HAL 9000. RSX is also about equal to an nvidia gtx 690. It can actually upgrade its self over time to be on par with the best pc gaming has to offer. Also why anyone would get a pc when a PS3 allows me to play at 4K resolution and that is with 3d stereo .

The Cell and RSX are together more powerful than a gaming PC. Alone, a gaming PC can outperform one of those parts, but, when put together, they completely blow it out of the water. Have you seen the leaked screenshots for Killzone 4? They will look better than what Crysis 3 on a GTX 690 has been shown to look like by a long shot.

indeed and KZ4 is rumored to be running at 120fps at 1600p. Thats madness. Only on Ps3 and cell is possible. I also heard that they were gonna use 32xAA but they opted only for 16xAA because there were some dropdowns to 110fps and the wanted silky smooth 120fps

stop being an idiot
Avatar image for k01mx
k01mx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 k01mx
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="k01mx"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Of course i don't think it, or any console game, comes close to PC games running on high end PCs, but i do think it's currently the best looking console game.

Stupid claims are made by every reviewers and sitess, though. Let's not forget gamespot game the graphics king award to MGS4 and not Crysis W.

PAL360

best looking games are only on ps3.

For fanboys who still live under a Sony's giant enemy crab, i believe they are. For those who prefer the real world, it's a matter of opinion, since both consoles have equally good looking games.

how can you even believe that both consoles are the same? the ps3 have the CELL and 360 have garbage.
Avatar image for k01mx
k01mx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 k01mx
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="k01mx"]Because the Cell-Processor can handle more simultaneous, parallel processes than any i7 can. It still pumps out more GFLOPS than any entire PC does. It can process graphics about as good as the GTX 460 naturally. Combine this with the RSX, which is about equal to a GTX 660Ti...you will never go back to PC gaming again...adamosmaki
No no you got it wrong. Actually cell out best a HAL 9000. RSX is also about equal to an nvidia gtx 690. It can actually upgrade its self over time to be on par with the best pc gaming has to offer. Also why anyone would get a pc when a PS3 allows me to play at 4K resolution and that is with 3d stereo .

The Cell and RSX are together more powerful than a gaming PC. Alone, a gaming PC can outperform one of those parts, but, when put together, they completely blow it out of the water. Have you seen the leaked screenshots for Killzone 4? They will look better than what Crysis 3 on a GTX 690 has been shown to look like by a long shot.
Avatar image for k01mx
k01mx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 k01mx
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

[QUOTE="Stefan91x"]Because I'm right?

:lol:

Stefan91x

nope, because you're dumb

calling me dumb = lack of arguments.

you are dumb for questioning the graphical capabilities of the ps3.
Avatar image for k01mx
k01mx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 k01mx
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

I posted?? Lol no, buddy, reviewers posted. You are free to disagree, though :)

PAL360

So you agree that Halo 4 looks like it's running on a state of the art gaming PC? You don't find that at all to be an outrageously dumbass thing to say?

Come on man, that's like something that would come out of a cow's mouth.

Of course i don't think it, or any console game, comes close to PC games running on high end PCs, but i do think it's currently the best looking console game.

Stupid claims are made by every reviewers and sitess, though. Let's not forget gamespot game the graphics king award to MGS4 and not Crysis W.

best looking games are only on ps3.
Avatar image for k01mx
k01mx

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 k01mx
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
Because the Cell-Processor can handle more simultaneous, parallel processes than any i7 can. It still pumps out more GFLOPS than any entire PC does. It can process graphics about as good as the GTX 460 naturally. Combine this with the RSX, which is about equal to a GTX 660Ti...you will never go back to PC gaming again...
  • 21 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3