depends on genre, although Batman aa is teen, first bad company was teen. The games that you listed are mostly shooters and fighting games. As long as the games are fun it doesnt matter what their ratings are.
in my opinion the psp was very sucessfull for sony. Nintendo has always owned the handheld market. Sony actually put their foot in the door there and they are still kicking. you cannot say that about any other handheld that has gone up against the almighty gameboy. Do you remember the sega game gear. That was an awesome handheld. The only draw back was it didnt receive the support that nintendo received. it also ate batteries like they were nothing.
they should put a whole heap of cutting edge components in the machine so we could watch the console melt before our eyes as we load up our first game.
Seriously, since when did everyone on this site get a mba in business. im sure none of you can determine the cost of adding supposidly cheap memory to consoles.
without copying or borrowing from other games, we wouldnt have such great interactive experiences in video games. all games take ideas from other games. I dont understand why people get butthurt when a game comes along that has a similar game mechanic as another. Uncharted, in my opinion, was a better experience than gears. Cover in gears is required, you would die very easily without it, cover in uncharted is very helpful but not as crucial for gameplay as it was for gears.
They both have great games. I have had a ps3 for about a year longer so my ps3 library is larger and more preferable. If it werent for mass effect i probably wouldnt even own a xbox 360. Since then though, i have had some great experiences on the xbox, as well as on the ps3.
what exactly does "slightly better" mean? Is it when you pause the game and you can see minute differences between two identical games that play pretty much identically. When the game is in full motion there is no way to see the difference. I own both hd consoles and i find it difficult to believe that these small differences actually affect game play or graphics(while in motion).
I bought an xbox 360 to play mass effect 1. Yet i buy mostly ps3 games including uc2. Uncharted 2 was a great game. It had awesome environments andhad pretty good multiplayer. But i just got board with the game. A game like mass effect has a very high replayability. Everytime you play through the game you get a different experience. You actually feel involved with the entire story of the game instead of going along for the ride. Yet i think it is unfair to compare 2 games from entirely different genres. i still feel like uc2 is worthy of all the acclaim that it received. We will see how well mass effect will do compared to uc2 last year.
If You play as a mage you need to be able to stop the action to choose your next spell. there is just too much that you need to manage. The game would also need to be dumbed way down for it to be a real time rpg
Log in to comment