XXXXXX

Forum Posts	Following	Followers
5202	39	22

kingman03

Follow

5202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 kingman03

Member since 2003 • 5202 Posts

[QUOTE="kingman03"]
[QUOTE="Phoenix534"]
How about a reliable source?
Phoenix534

How about just accepting the fact that companies have been doing this for ages?

How about realizing that I never said anything about anyone not bribing? I was just agreeing that Destructiod is anything but a reliable source.

In a sense, you did. You are saying Destructoid isn't a reliable/trustworthy site. Which implies you are also saying that this is a lie. Which also implies that ubisoft didn't bribe anyone. What would be a reliable source for you? IGN? Gamespot? Gamersyde? They are all the same and are just posting things other gaming review companies have told them.

15 years ago

kingman03

Follow

5202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 kingman03

Member since 2003 • 5202 Posts

[QUOTE="kingman03"]
[QUOTE="Phoenix534"]
This is what I was thinking.
Phoenix534

http://www.wearetheinternetz.com/2009/11/07/ubisoft-demanding-high-scores-for-early-assassins-creed-2-reviews/comment-page-1/

here ya go.

How about a reliable source?

How about just accepting the fact that companies have been doing this for ages?

15 years ago

kingman03

Follow

5202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 kingman03

Member since 2003 • 5202 Posts

My god, if this was mw2 the haters would be having a hayday right about now.
TuRb0SxxT

Ya, but the thing is IW doesn't have to threat/bribe anyone to get good reviews. Ubisoft and AC2 is probably going to get some harsh reviews from a few places because they know the game isn't going to be as good as everyone hypes it up to be.

When people hype games, it goes way beyond people's expectations of what they will truly get.

15 years ago

kingman03

Follow

5202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 kingman03

Member since 2003 • 5202 Posts

[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Destructoid? When did they become credible?Phoenix534

This is what I was thinking.

http://www.wearetheinternetz.com/2009/11/07/ubisoft-demanding-high-scores-for-early-assassins-creed-2-reviews/comment-page-1/

here ya go.

15 years ago

kingman03

Follow

5202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 kingman03

Member since 2003 • 5202 Posts

Wow, I can't believe they would do that to some reviewers. They hype their own game up to heaven and back, but are afraid of reviewers slamming the game down to hell. If they are confident in the game they made, they shouldn't have to ask people to give it a high score. If they know their game is good, they wouldn't have done that. obviously something is wrong with the game where they have to force people to give it a high score. Such BS.

15 years ago

kingman03

Follow

5202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 kingman03

Member since 2003 • 5202 Posts

[QUOTE="SparkyProtocol"]It'll probably get better.DeadMagazines

Which is funny since the 360 version was great right off the bat. 360 features don't need constant updating or patching to get them to the acceptable level..and people wonder why PSN is ridiculed. It's nice if you like sloppy seconds and after-thoughts.

No it wasn't. It was crap on 360 when it was first released. There was a whole ton of topics making fun of netflix on 360 saying how slow it was and how the quality of the movies were less than SD. The PS3 version is actually really fast. It depends on your connection.

15 years ago

kingman03

Follow

5202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

22

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 kingman03