btw way i wrote my previous comment without looking at the pictures. Now that i have looked at the pictures i can say that the PC version does look the best but not with a CHASM of difference from the console versions especially the 360 version. this was a bad comparison. every 1 knows the ps3 version of fo 3 is weak.
frankly i dunno why they put up these comparisons. Prolly just to see the fanboys and fangirls squirm over comments and such. Everyone knows the PC versions supposed to be the best given the specifications. If they really wanna compare textures and performance they should do it with each ones' own exclusives because exclusive games bring out the best out of their own designated consoles. MGS 4 vs Halo 3 vs Crysis Warhead . for example. I played crysis on all High settings. I prefer MGS 4 and Halo 3 graphics. All shine and no substance dont do for me. The lighting sucked as well. Halo 3 and MGS 4 lighting looks awesome. Thats just my opinion.
Huh? id much rather buy a MGS4 bundled ps3 thank you very much. Lol at crysis. the game must be crying by now to be run on Very High at a decent frame rate but theres just nothing out there that can attend to that. tip to crytek. next time u make a game make sure 1 quarter of the pc gaming population can run it at medium settings.
pomp vr. u must b a janitor for crytek .lol . every where we go there is som pc prick thats making smug remarx bout pc being the most powerful and geforce 8800 gts and yada yada yada and how pc owns the ps3 and 360. to tell u the truth its making my want shoot my self like in persona 3.ppl when we talk about pc we dont say "the" pc we say "that" pc. us console owners can say in general "the powerful" 360 or "the muscle bound" ps3 but we cant say "the awesom" pc coz pcs dont hav a pair of legs to stand on their own. these prix u find in forums give them their legs. " my pc has core 2 duo ..." bla bla constantly claiming superiority. dudes if u make a custom machine with whole lot of bux then its ur friggin business but dont compare it with big big names like sony's and ms's consoles. compare it with ur garage buddy who has the same self built rig . my point is if som 1 has 1000000$ they can either by a ferrari or build a ferrari-like thing, mayb even better, but tell u wat it wont be called ferrari . itll b called the "the thing i made". other than that average persons pc is way less powerful then our next gen consoles. 2 put it easily so that u flying hi morons with their " hi end " pcs can understand buying a next gen console with 600$ is the cheapest most easiest way to have a truly next gen xperience. that aside when hardcore gamers like me set up their consoles with a sony bravia and a kenwood 5.1 dolby prologic enabled surround system we can almost literally step inside the game. im not being smug but being regretful that a lot of ppl hav not xperienced this feeling and i wish that they had becoz that way they cud tell that minor differences in textures and antialiasing cant stand up to the major difference in the entire xperience of the game that u get from such a setup.any 1 disagreeing doesnt hasnt enjoyed this feeling. 360 and ps3 fanboys bicker all the time but i luv both consoles and am mostly found in between their bickering but i take the side of both my 360 controller and dual shock 3 (soon to b coming) when it comes to a few middle aged i -earn- my -own-living morons bragging with their 3000 to 5000$ pcs.
azkotek: watever that name means. "YOU hate so-called Halo haters and it shows" funniest bs i read all day. lol im a sony fan and that being said i think there is a sony mob outside my house waiting to impale me with pitch forks . despite liking sony franchiese wayyyyy more than ms i luv games 1st and foremost meaning i own both consoles becoz games r my 1st priority not a brand name. i luv halo from the pillar of autumn to finishing the fite. i never stated that i hated halo haters(coz im an observer,lol) which is pretty ridiculous becoz im 2 busy with halo 3 and repeating wat i said earlier i believe halo 3 is a strong enough game that can defend itself against fanboy attacks so its pretty pointless to say anything "hateful"(lol) to them. since ive been studying halo haters' thought patterns ive been lmao at how they secretly wish they had a 360 to check halo out. for every gud comm there is always som 1out there with an insect mentality that misunderstands the greater thinking of the commenter which is fanboyism is for noobs.lol
armus360."So stop winning" is that a gesture of ur admittance that sony fan boys r winning.lol coz i no u wanted to type "whining". my point is plz read the bs u type before midlessly clicking on submit button. gizmo_logix: u hav a gud point. gears, darkness and bioshock r still the most graphically impressive games on 360. uncharted isnt out so its graphix will get only better from here. clever NYC: for the last friggin time halo 3 does not run on 1080p . its max res is 720 p. u and those who hav said the same thing r makin fools of themselves given that ur not fools 2 begin with.
thru advanced studying and observation(lol) i hav finally found out wy halo "haters" or ppl who "hate" halo actually "hate" halo.its that they dont hate halo ...... they hate its popularity, they hate the hype its made( tho over hype), they hate the money its earned, they hate the fan boys cheering for it, they hate halo being portrayed as the greatest fps ever ( by som ppl) which has som how becom the general idea of the masses. i hav com to understand that for every gud thing that is out there , there will always b ppl to hate it. (no denying that halo is a good thing be it 1 2 or 3).
kratos_karmakar's comments