LambentTyto's forum posts

  • 22 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for lambenttyto
LambentTyto

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 LambentTyto
Member since 2015 • 33 Posts

@Random_Matt said:
@ezekiel43 said:
@Random_Matt said:

1080P, 1060, 1440P, 1070.

Neither are future proof, considering Volta is around the corner.

What's important is if good games are even going to be demanding enough to use the power of Volta and what graphical features are even important to you.

That true, but I'm guessing when PS4/X1 get replaced then the base power will move forward.

Might be better to go with the 1070. Could give me an extra year of so of use.

Avatar image for lambenttyto
LambentTyto

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 LambentTyto
Member since 2015 • 33 Posts

@pyro1245: Definitely sticking with 1080p.

Avatar image for lambenttyto
LambentTyto

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By LambentTyto
Member since 2015 • 33 Posts

@npiet1:

@npiet1 said:

Ive got the 250gb ssd Samsung evo 960 (paired with a wd 1tb for storage), i love it, i also am using the b350m (mines just white) mobo. It boots in 1-2seconds. Ive got 2400 ram no issue on games they still load in less than 30 seconds. Judging that the 1060 is just becoming recommend for high on aaa games id say you'd be fine. Though i honestly don't know if 500gb is enough for the future as some aaa games are 60gb with most being 50gb

Well, I'd basically be putting the important games on the SSD, mainly multiplayer titles. But for the optical drive, that's where most of the single player titles would be going. Of course, after I play a single player title, I don't usually keep it installed, since there's usually a some space between my replays of most of them. I'm going for the EVO 860 btw. Yeah, money saving.

Avatar image for lambenttyto
LambentTyto

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By LambentTyto
Member since 2015 • 33 Posts

@npiet1 said:

Ive got the ryzen 5 1400 with the 6gb 1060 i play most aaa 1080 @ atleast 60fps on high-ultr

Yeah, that's definitely working for games right now. Did some extra calculations. If I go with the 1060, I'll have enough extra cash to get a 500GB SSD and a 4GB optical drive. Or if I go with a 250GB SSD and a 2GB optical drive I can probably get 3200 RAM. I just wonder if we'd be playing the Witcher IV or Elder Scrolls VI in two or so years at medium settings with a good frame rate of sixty or so... I have to say, though, filling these weak areas out a bit is very attractive.

Avatar image for lambenttyto
LambentTyto

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By LambentTyto
Member since 2015 • 33 Posts

Oops! Typo in the title. GTX 1070 8GB*

I want a card I can still be using in two or three years time. If the 1060 will do that, that I think I will go with that. The EVGA Super Clocked edition is going on Amazon right now for $280, which is a lot cheaper than the 1070 Founders editions for $399 on Nvidia's website. The reason I would go with the regular 1070, specifically the founders edition is because it's new and under $400. I'm currently living in a third world country, and to skip customs and extra taxes, I'm not allowed to ship orders in exceeding $400, so there ya go.

Anyway, this comes down to whether or not I can still be gaming on one of these cards two or three years down the line on say, MEDIUM settings on the latest and greatest triple A titles. I'm aiming for a total budget of $1000 for by build, and with the 1070, I'm capped at $970. If I get the 1060, I can add an extra hard drive, because right now I only plan on getting a 250gb SSD, so I'd really like to add an extra drive. I'm also going with a Ryzen 5 1600, and a B350 motherboard and 16GB 2400 ram for $145.

So what do you think about the difference in cards? It seems there's about a %20 performance difference between the two, which isn't a whole lot. I also plan on gaming in 1080, nothing higher.

TL;DR: GTX 1060 6GB vs GTX 1070 8GB Founders Edition with the aim of still being able to game on the latest triple A titles on settings above MINIMUM.

Avatar image for lambenttyto
LambentTyto

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By LambentTyto
Member since 2015 • 33 Posts

I don't actually have a gaming computer or a console, except for this crappy laptop I'm writing this post from. That's the reason why I watch Let's Plays. I've been an avid gamer since I was a kid, and still remember the gold old days of Perfect Dark on the Nintendo 64 with fondness. Unfortunately a few years ago I kind of had to give up on gaming, and now I just watch the occasional Let's Play here and there, though with always the intent to start at the beginning and watch them all the way through to the end, assuming I'm not dreadfully bored. Some games just don't translate well to the Let's Play enthronement in my opinion.

I'm rambling...

So why do you watch Let's Plays?

If there's anything I hate about certain videos it's when the Let's Player has a poor quality mic with popping noises. I also don't like multiple people in the videos.

How bout yall?

Sigh... I need to get a new gaming PC!!!

Avatar image for lambenttyto
LambentTyto

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 LambentTyto
Member since 2015 • 33 Posts

@Maroxad said:

@lambenttyto said:
@Maroxad said:

@lambenttyto said:

What does the player base actually look like these days?

When I gave it a shot again, every player had moved over to the US servers (I am european).

How long ago was that?

A few months ago. I remember I wanted to play a good Guild Wars game again because the second one (Guild Wars 2) was absolute shit.

So the game being somewhat old-ish, what available resolutions does it support? I'm running 1366 x 768 resolution.

Avatar image for lambenttyto
LambentTyto

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 LambentTyto
Member since 2015 • 33 Posts
@Maroxad said:

@lambenttyto said:

What does the player base actually look like these days?

When I gave it a shot again, every player had moved over to the US servers (I am european).

How long ago was that?

Avatar image for lambenttyto
LambentTyto

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 LambentTyto
Member since 2015 • 33 Posts

@Maroxad said:

@lambenttyto said:

So I've got a few questions for anyone out there playing the original Guild Wars online. I was thinking of grabbing the platinum edition for $20. If you can help me out, I'd appreciate it.

1) On their website they say there's no monthly subscription fees after you buy the game. I like this a lot, but what I want to know is, will I have access to ALL content within the game without having to make further purchases for extra gear and such?

2) Is the player base large?

3) If it is possibly to make further purchases for the game after buying the platinum edition, do those purchases make your stronger? In other words, is Guild Wars a "pay to win" game?

4) What do you like most about Guild Wars?

5) What do you like least about it?

I'm interested in Guild Wars because I have all the soundtracks and they're some of the best I've ever heard for fantasy video games.

I know that's a lot of questions, but I don't want to waste any money.

Anyway, thanks for reading!

1. As long as you have the expansions you can access nearly all the content, there are a few side chapters that are not included in the expansions but those dont provide you with any advantage, just a bit more story.

2. No.

3. Guild Wars is not a pay to win game. As a matter of fact, you can hit the power ceiling pretty fast. With the only real upgrades after that being a more diverse deck.

4. I like the combat a lot. The classes are great too and allows for a lot of roles that go outside the typical tank/healer/damage dealer. There are mesmers who can royally mess up the opposition, warriors who can halt your advancement preventing melees from reaching the mesmers with ease. Rangers who can interrupt your party members, ruining their potentially table turning spells, the classes really add a lot of depth to the combat. A well coordinated enemy team is a lot like a puzzle for your party to solve. What are this enemy party's team composition and how do we break them using our skills?

5. The shortage of players nowadays is my main gripe. Followed by the poor pacing of the prophecies campaign.

What does the player base actually look like these days?

Avatar image for lambenttyto
LambentTyto

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 LambentTyto
Member since 2015 • 33 Posts

@Ish_basic said:

Guild Wars has story missions which are instanced, fairly long missions with accompanying cutscenes. There are lots of sidequests which have text-based deliveries, but the main campaigns are all done with in-game cutscenes.

one of the cool things they added in the third campaign was heroes, which are AI buddies that you outfit with weapons and skills, tailoring them to your own needs/tastes. Very late on they even added the ability to conscript your other characters as heroes, calling them "mercenary heroes," which is pretty cool.

By far what I appreciated about GW was the depth of the skills and how many different ways you can play a single character. So, take my Ranger...sometimes I would play as a beastmaster, wielding a staff, choosing a dire evolution pet (you can grow pets to three different stat lines - damage, health or balanced) and focusing on pet attack skills. I might go traditional archer, where I liked to use a kindle-conjure build, with conjure flame from the elementalist profession and trip and dual shots for my primary damage source. Or, for fun, I might run dual daggers with a spider pet and poison-based assassin combos. There's just so many ways to play.

The second best thing was the complexity of the enemies and their scripting. Each area feels like it has a specific character. Most online RPGs, enemies just look different and the devs don't even bother to worry about strengths, weaknesses or any kind of variance, getting lazy to the point where you can apply bleeds even to boxes (rift?). In GW you really have to think about what kind of enemies you're going to fight before you decide on your build going in. Thankfully the devs added a template system which allows you to save builds and trade with other players, easily subbing them in and out with a drop down menu while in an outpost. But, for example, if you're in Kryta, you're dealing with undead, so conditions, minion mastery, all that kinds of stuff is useless because skeletons don't bleed and you can't make flesh golems out of bones. If you're going up against Mursaat as a tank, you better thing about damage mitigation for defense, because damage avoidance skills, usually stances, don't work very well against mursaat front line fighters. I can't describe how many modern ORPGs and MMOs fail at creating this kind of complexity and it's a shame.

Anyway, loved GW...put ridiculous amounts of time into it...something like 4800 hours over five or six years if i remember right.

Dude, I think you just sold me on it! Just going to make sure there's no region locking (because I'm currently residing in Ecuador 'bleh!') and if there's no, then I'm going to get the game and play. Hopefully I can get my friends to game with me, but since the player base is somewhat low these days, we want to make sure we have enough players for a decent party.

Thanks for the response!

  • 22 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3