im looking to pick this up for ps3 but im a little hesitant. reviews bash the ps3 version like no other but i wanted to see what the GS community members thought. also, hows the multiplayer. and last have they patched any issues with it since release?

Simply put, the search engine thingy wouldn't work, so I remade a new thread

Are the MGO expansion's worth it?

Im new to getting only with kz2 and mgo, im just looking for a group of ppl to play with that are tactical in thier approach....I almost always finish in the top 3 of my team on kz2 with an outragously positive score, and I am getting about the same with MGO but there is alot more to learn in that game...my tag is bwade065 if any clan mates are interested

[QUOTE="lampolo"][QUOTE="DJ419"]

Precisely, even if it was ported to consoles. I would never get it on anything besides a pc.

DJ419

Today's consoles are built around their controllers, not keyboards and mice. You wouldn't see the same optimization. I also think it is safe to say that most console gamers prefer a controller over a mouse and keyboard. I've tried MMOs on consoles before and they never felt right, that may just be my preference though.

They need to stop milking the star wars franchise, and personally i'm not a star wars fan anyways.Sk8ter_213

[QUOTE="Scianix-Black"]

Not happening.

DJ419

Precisely, even if it was ported to consoles. I would never get it on anything besides a pc.

Not happening.

Scianix-Black

I believe if is successful enough on PC, developers will lean towards a console port of the game. Things I would like see are, ablility to plug and play a keyboard mouse, or a optimized interface which could very easily be done.(just take KOTOR for instance) I would hope for the game to have a required install for the sake of game running smoothly. A monthly fee would obviously still apply. Some mods could be allowed as they did with unreal tournament. What are your thoughts?

I'm looking to buy this as an extra controller, wondering if it would be a good buy?Also if one knows...whats the diffrence in ver1 and ver2

[QUOTE="TriangleHard"]

[QUOTE="raven_squad"]

I don't care if theres a story with it. It don't like it.

Possibly. But most serial killers don't murder in ways where there will be cops to witness it... *hurrrrrr*

Hey dude, if you can't see the difference between a game that *allows* you to kill innocents, and a game thats PRIMARY FOCUS is killing innocents (in most likely depraved, disgusting and lecherous ways rather then just shooting or hitting with a car), then nothing else can be said on the subject. You just can't see both sides.

Also, I can't think of very many movies in which the main character is a serial killer that preys on innocents with no justification. Mostly just those biographies of famous serial killers or that show Dexter, and even that justifies it eventually however contrived it may be.

You don't have to like it. Like how I don't like FPS games.

Many serial killers get caught because detective usually gets the clues and track him down, which the game would be about if anyone would attempt to make one.

There are plenty of movies that has serial killers as main character. American Psycho, Willard, etc.

I most certainly don't mind a game that PRIMARY FOCUS killing innocents as long as the game is good. It's a GAME. Not real. No theme is far off.

I've killed my innocent sister in Fatal Frame II (which is the normal ending so most people saw this), made a young girl sell herself to brothel as a payment to me to kill someone (part of the story in Ryu Ga Gotoku Kenzan!), I've murdered not just innocent but great men who helps people in Assassin's Creed, etc etc etc. Games have been doing messed up things for a while, so why this is all of sudden sick and twisted?

The point is, no game should have boundaries when it comes to themes. No one should make game such as this because there is almost no market out there for it, but not because there is some moral issues they conflicts with the idea.

by nature i'm fairly lenient on what should be allowed in movies and video games and I fully realize that games are just games.With that said, i still believe there's a line that shouldn't be crossed. The whole idea of a serial killer game is based on a very mentally ill and twisted notion of taking innocent lives because of some fetish or warped idea of justice. Understandably so, many games involve innocent casualties in some way or another, but a serial killer game is a whole other breed violence. Serial killers have existed throughout the history of our and foreign countries alike; and no one is denying their existence, if anything these individuals, when found, become instant historic figures due to their atrocious acts. But, by making a game about their beliefs and way of life is the same thing as celebrating the act of serial killing. agree or disagree, that's your choice. but this game would go into the same category of "let's slit our wrist" or "gang rape mania: after school special" (for all intents and purposes, the titles are fictitious). why does it go into that category? because it's sick.

I see your point of "well, we already have games that kill people, what's one more step into the darkness?" but my point is "yeah, we entered into some violent territory with our games, but let's take a step back."

we know games are violent, but why make them perverse?

sure, many of us are enlightened enough to play it as a game if one like it ever comes into existence, but unfortunately many are not as wise. maybe it's a romantic notion, but i still think that there's at least a hint of morality in this society not to push something like this into the gaming industry.

i'm almost torn saying all of this, becasue i don't really give a **** what people want to play and howthey enjoy themselves, but i'm saddened that there's even a need to justify something like serial killing in game or anywhere else for that matter.

creative idea? maybe. good idea? don't think so.

argument welcome, but no flamming.