I still say AAA = 3 AAs. AA = 3 As. It makes the most sense.

If we say that 1 AAA = 2 AAs then 2 AAs can trump an AAA. Thats absurd. At the same time if we say that each is worth a point as of how many As they have, that is also absurd. 3 As do not equal one AAA. You have to either do it in multipls or on a scale of 10.

If 10 is AAAA, then 7 would be AAA, 5 AA, and 3 A.

hakanakumono

If a game scores a 9 and another scores an 8.5, the game with a .5 score higher is worth 3x more?

If you deduce it mathematically it's only a 5% higher score, yet you're saying it has 300% more value?

No. Just no.

[QUOTE="Pdiddy105"]

>Now add in the multiplatform titles and the wii is an embarrasment in comparison.

CDUB316

that's not what tiger woods 2010 says

come to think of it. Wii multiplats are actually doing well right now. Never thought I'd be saying that.

Oh look everybody, the Cows are trying to change the rules again so they can claim "2009 year of the PS3" even though the Wii is mopping the floor with it.

lol

[QUOTE="leonalabasters"]

I'll sum it up:

Fanboys are forced to take a position in every argument

Fanboy 1 takes the initial arguement (in this case that the Wii is winning 2009 in exclsuives with 7 AAe, and 7Ae)

and Fanboy 2 is forced into the role of counter argument (in this case the one being that 2 AAAe is somehow better than 7AAe and 7Ae)

In this case Fanboy 2 is forced to take on the role of a ridiculous counter argument, trying to make everybody believe that these two games, which in many cases scored only .5 higher, are more valuable than 14 games which scored slightly lower.

A daunting task for fanboy 2, he will have to reduce the argument to a woefully low point whereby he turns it into a stall match by playing the opinion card, in the end content to be walking away with 'well it's all a matter of opinion'.

The end.

redfordo

I'll sum it up:

Fanboys are forced to take a position in every argument

Fanboy 1 takes the initial arguement (in this case that the Wii is winning 2009 in exclsuives with 7 AAe, and 7Ae)

and Fanboy 2 is forced into the role of counter argument (in this case the one being that 2 AAAe is somehow better than 7AAe and 7Ae)

In this case Fanboy 2 is forced to take on the role of a ridiculous counter argument, trying to make everybody believe that these two games, which in many cases scored only .5 higher, are more valuable than 14 games which scored slightly lower.

A daunting task for fanboy 2, he will have to reduce the argument to a woefully low point whereby he turns it into a stall match by playing the opinion card, in the end content to be walking away with 'well it's all a matter of opinion'.

The end.

[QUOTE="leonalabasters"]

[QUOTE="ImaPirate0202"]

I think you're finally getting it. Arguing opinions is and always will be, pointless.

pyromaniac223

14 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2

[QUOTE="leonalabasters"]

[QUOTE="ImaPirate0202"]

...in your opinion.

ImaPirate0202

I think you're finally getting it. Arguing opinions is and always will be, pointless.

14 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2

Cows trying to argue that 2AAAE >>>>>>> 7AAE +7AE :lol:

Joke?

[QUOTE="leonalabasters"]

[QUOTE="ImaPirate0202"]

AAAE > AAE is an opinion? You've dug yourself a hole that you simply can't climb out of.

ImaPirate0202

7AAE + 7AE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2AAAE.... to even attempt to suggest otherwise is ridiculous.

...in your opinion.