Far cry 2 is gonna rock !

Hmmm? You REALLY think so?

Heres the link:

Killzone 2 comparison

To me the new gameplay from SP and MP kills the E3 05' footage. The old footage looked to cartoony while the new footage looks more real life looking.

GreyFoXX4

Agreed the old footage looked dull.And the new footage is yet to be completed,still its a killer !

Hmmm? You REALLY think so?

Heres the link:

Killzone 2 comparison

To me the new gameplay from SP and MP kills the E3 05' footage. The old footage looked to cartoony while the new footage looks more real life looking.

GreyFoXX4

[QUOTE="lesner87"][QUOTE="muscleserge"]

muscleserge

Go ahead i always like to enlighten my knowledge ;) .

Heres your comaprison :

http://gametomorrow.com/blog/index.php/2007/09/05/cell-vs-g80/

Huh ! thanks for wasting my time with your 3 and a half year old article (PS3 wasnt even out) which basis have of its conclusion of predictions ! :D

Dont quote things from REMOVED or PULLED articles i have such articles saying cell is 5x more powerfull than a quad core cpu.Thats because their info is usually wrong.No wonder they are pulled off !

About ray tracing.Can you please tell me whats exactly is a CPU which cant be compared with a GPU ? lol ....

http://www.gametomorrow.com/blog/index.php/2005/11/30/gpus-vs-cell

"This kind of algorithm is pretty much ideal for the GPU - extremely high arithmetic intensity and almost zero bandwidth usage"

"By converting this CG shader from AOS to SOA form, SIMD utilization was much higher which resulted in Cell out performing the Nvidia 7800 by a factor of 5 - 6x using only 7 SPEs for rendering"

Here IBM takes on Cell :

http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/power/library/pa-cellperf/

Result : "The Cell BE is a best-of-breed design that delivers significant computational power, high bandwidth, excellent power and performance, and leading area efficiency within the constraints of a process technology."

"the Cell BE can outperform leading-edge processors on a variety of workloads by approximately an order of magnitude, in some cases more,when software is tuned and optimized for this architecture. "

Glad you like it, good to see so much positive attitude towards the PS3 these days. Even my brother (a huge Lemming) has said he's interested in getting one.Floppy_Jim

hhhahaha lol what a coincidence.My younger brother after playing MGS4 and Heavenly sword on my PS3 wants to sell his X360 and get one too :D

that's better, the trees in crysis obviously look better but the rocks in farcry 2 are better and the grasslands too

markop2003

Yes because Far CRy 2 never really had an approach towards beautiful trees and lush green jungles.It was more towards a realistic sort of approach which in my oppinion they have achieved !

[QUOTE="lesner87"][QUOTE="IgorVitaly"][QUOTE="NinjaMunkey01"]

Also crytek may have deal with sony for an exclusive or something. OR maybe they think that like this gen, the ps4 will be more powerfull again, the cell is still advancing and I heard that it could make its way to pc's, so the PS4 could be used for their devs as a way of getting used to the cell at a more advanced level.

muscleserge

Cell wont come to PC since its way weaker than a Quad core and Intels new CPU crushes the upcomming Cell prototype. PS3 has already shown its weakness this gen after all the hype it got generated.

Do your homework before talking !

http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/37845/135/

You really think a Quad core cpu can beat Cell with 8 cores running at 3.2GHZ each and 512mb XDR memory ?

Go ahead i always like to enlighten my knowledge ;) .

Heres your comaprison :

http://gametomorrow.com/blog/index.php/2007/09/05/cell-vs-g80/

TC thats a very nice try comparing FAR Cry 2s WORST and Crysis` BEST.

This is FAIR :