http://lilburtonboy7489.wordpress.com/

Life isn't fair. Some people are born into wealth, and some are born into poverty. Some have no talent, and some have amazing amounts of talent. Some people are born with disabilities, and some are born perfectly healthy.

These things are not fair, so some feel the need to correct these unfair situations. So without giving us the choiceto act morally and help these people, the government forces us to support programs that try to correct these unfair situations (Apparently the government is pushing the ideal that thing should be fair, totalitarianism anyone?).

So they redistribute our wealth, taking from those well-off and giving to those in need. So what about physical disabilities? Same concept isn't it? Wealth is our private property, just like our body. The government has the authority to take our private property, so why not our body parts. Say that someone is blind, and I was born with great eyesight. This isn't fair at all. So shouldn't the government correct this unfairness by taking one of my eyeballs and giving to the blind man? Why not?

I just watched the "Reagan Library Debate" on CNN, and as usual watched Ron Paul royally pwn all of the other wannabe republicans. But seriously, the other pathetic candidates sit there and spew their political rhetoric for 10 minutes at a time. What makes me so angry is the amount of time that Paul gets to speak. Here are the reasons that he gets the shaft.

Ron Paul has this terrible problem, he knows how to answer questions too shortly. When asked a yes or no question, he says either yes or no, and then back up his answer with cum provoking statements. When the other candidates are asked a yes or no question, they pretend to not be cognitively disabled and throw out these very refined drawn out stories about their accomplishments. Usually these statements have nothing to do with the question, and by the time they answer the question(if they even do) you forget what the question even was. Even if you do somehow remember the simple question, if you hear the answer to the question, you won't know when they say it because it's buried underneath all of the BS puring out of those holes in the front of their faces.

So in the end, Paul's terrible habbit of answering yes or no questions with a yes or no, gets him shafted. Also the fact that he refuses to talk about how good he has performed his job in the past also hurts him, because the other candidates will take every chance they get to kiss other politicians asses all while talking about how much they think they rule. They all need to be fed some humble pie.