No. Make an argument, then I'll respond. I don't have time for lazy people googling 'big bang disproved' or something to that effect and crapping the results onto the thread as a response.
Actually, you don't need to make an argument against the third one. The third one is an argument in favor of the Big Bang. I imagine that he just posted it because of the title.
I remember the days when one actually had to have knowledge of a subject in order to discuss it, rather than just going to Google and pasting links whose page titles sound good... :(
Exactly. It makes me genuinely angry that people like him have the nerve to plop down links without even reading them first, and then accuse ME of being the lazy one.
[QUOTE="loquaciousness"][QUOTE="Snipes_2"] So, you argue that it's a fact that this happened and that this theory is without any doubt reliable? Snipes_2
No. Make an argument, then I'll respond. I don't have time for lazy people googling 'big bang disproved' or something to that effect and crapping the results onto the thread as a response.
[QUOTE="Snipes_2"] How did everything come into being then? Snipes_2
Do you mean the universe as we know it? Big bang+millions of years of evolution. The mass that created the big bang? Who knows, but just because it's currently unkown does not mean god is a logical explanation.
Tthe Big Bang is based on Ifs, Buts, and Thens. It's a Theory...Jesus no what are you doing. The big bang theory has very sound evidence in its favour, none of which, I'll wager, you've bothered to read about.
[QUOTE="Snipes_2"] I'm sure the idea that everything just appeared is totally reasonable though right?Snipes_2
No one ever said that everything just appeared.
How did everything come into being then? Um, spontaneous creation is absolutely possible. Things happen totally without cause at subatomic levels all the time.
Log in to comment