[QUOTE="-voodoo_child-"]Hmm that's wierd because this shows loads of people in the queue for a PS3. How many did they have in stock?kingyoto

Your denial is making me cry from laughter :lol::cry: 

good for you.geodisicdome

Thats funny...When i read the thread title i thought "Good for you loser" 

Allright then...Where was your crying and moaning when the Xbox version of Medal of Honor Frontline scored .5 lower then the PS2 version simply because it was 6 months old? The Xbox had exclusive multiplayer split screen, and the xbox version even got the "best" tag, the only reason it scored .5 less is because the Xbox version was 6 months old!

How is that any different then Oblivion scoring .1 less for being a year old? If the Xbox version of Medal of Honor Frontline scored .5 lower then the PS2 version yet the Xbox version still got the best tag, then i think you guys should quit you moaning.

Again let me make it a little simpler for you cry babies..

MOH Frontline comes out for PS2 and gets a 9.0...6 months later it comes out for Xbox and gets a 8.5 and the "Best" tag...

Oblivion comes out for Xbox 360 and gets a 9.6...12 months later it comes out for PS3 and gets a 9.5 without the "Best" tag..

How does that show MS favorism?? 

Errrrrrrrrrr. Thats my friend right there and he says all future Gears of War games are staying Xbox 360 exclusive

Considering the PS3 version runs smoother, freezes less, loads less often and faster, has better textures, better draw distance, more natuaral colors and lighting, and comes with $10 worth of extra content free, I think the score is rediculous.  The 360 and PC version are identical.  The PS3 version is a much more enjoyable experience.

It is true that there are some audio bugs, but nothing that wont be fixed thru patches.  Its not like the 360 version didnt have audio bugs of its own.

I cant believe GS doesnt even try to hide there fanboyism.  You cant ever right a review that pleases everyone of course.  Some may think a game scores too high or too low no matter what the game.  Although, When you start having a track record for underscoring and bashing everything one particular company puts out then yes, you are biased and dont deserve to be a journalist even if you are a mediocre one at that.

Mod me, I dont care.  I love all three consoles for different reasons.  Its just hard to sit back and watch all these double standards, and favoritism plague this site I used to enjoy.

treelog187

Again...Read my posts,  4 post above yours...Stop your crying...

[QUOTE="kingsfan_0333"]WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU GUYS TALKING ABOUT?  Do you actually listen to yourselves?  Oblivion got a 9.5 here, which is right in line with what the "they say" section says.  Gamespot is biased for agreeing with all the other review sites out there?  When are you going to drop all this "bias" nonsense and realize that you are just making excuses.lhbchen

You agree GS is biased, and Oblivion was underated for PS3?  Just STFU and read my post,  3 post above yours.

They did it for that simple reason. For it to be .1 less. That way, when someone is down to the wire choosing between buying a PS3 or 360, they can look back at some of the games they're interested in and see that .1 difference. You think, "It's just a review, and it's just .1 of a point" but mentally that will sway people continuously towards the 360. I think GS is well aware of what they're doing. There are several games reviewed that receive .1 worse of a score.Airek49

Read my posts 2 post above yours.

Where were all you crybabies when the Xbox version of Medal of Honor Frontline scored 8.5 and the PS2 version got a 9.0?  Thats a huge difference,  and the difference was because the Xbox version was 6 months old.  Nothing more,  the Xbox version even added split screen multiplayer,  and it even got the "Best" tag.  But  the Xbox version still scored 8.5 and the PS2 version still scored 9.0...

And when you guys did your stupid little AAA counts,  you included MOH Frontline,  and lemmings could not include the superior Xbox version in there AAA count because it scored 8.5