m3Boarder32's forum posts

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@Diddies said:
@m3Boarder32 said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@m3Boarder32 said:

So that’s your definition of close? One game? And a game that obviously has Dynamic Resolution so you already put yourself in a no lose situation...

And than it needs to average 30 FPS? When you know damn well it’s vsync locked to 30 because nobody wants screen tearing. Wouldn’t minimum be the fairer barometer If it’s vsync locked to 30 max...

oh of course not because a 980ti dips to 24 FPS on “High” at 4K, a setting that could very well be higher on X1X

I'm hung up on the fact that you actually think that consoles play games at a PC "high" equivalent or better regardless of resolution.

You been living under a rock?

xbox one x clearly does in most games.

gears

forza 7

forza H 3

witcher 3

care to tell me which game is medium Settings on X1X?

PUBG & 12 fps. lol

Still in development, good effort

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@m3Boarder32 said:

So that’s your definition of close? One game? And a game that obviously has Dynamic Resolution so you already put yourself in a no lose situation...

And than it needs to average 30 FPS? When you know damn well it’s vsync locked to 30 because nobody wants screen tearing. Wouldn’t minimum be the fairer barometer If it’s vsync locked to 30 max...

oh of course not because a 980ti dips to 24 FPS on “High” at 4K, a setting that could very well be higher on X1X

The X1X doesn't run Wildlands at 4K.

It also doesn’t dip to 24 FPS, and likely is a mix of ultra and high settings

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@m3Boarder32 said:

So that’s your definition of close? One game? And a game that obviously has Dynamic Resolution so you already put yourself in a no lose situation...

And than it needs to average 30 FPS? When you know damn well it’s vsync locked to 30 because nobody wants screen tearing. Wouldn’t minimum be the fairer barometer If it’s vsync locked to 30 max...

oh of course not because a 980ti dips to 24 FPS on “High” at 4K, a setting that could very well be higher on X1X

I'm hung up on the fact that you actually think that consoles play games at a PC "high" equivalent or better regardless of resolution.

You been living under a rock?

xbox one x clearly does in most games.

gears

forza 7

forza H 3

witcher 3

care to tell me which game is medium Settings on X1X?

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@Dark_sageX said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@Dark_sageX said:
@Juub1990 said:
@Dark_sageX said:

Prove it. Show me an article or video that proves that Ghost Recon Wildlands runs at native 4k on the Xbox ONE X (or "literally 2 million pixels more than 1440p")

He's right. It's 1440p on the PS4 Pro and "up to 1800p" on the X1X which is around 2 million more pixels than 1440p. On the other hand 4K is 2.5 million more pixels than 1800p.

Let's be clear - you're not getting a native 4K upgrade here on Xbox One X, but what you are getting is a 56 per cent boost in resolution over PS4 Pro

Source

I thought 2 million more pixels meant native 4k. Not that it matters, the Xbox ONE X doesn't come close to a GTX 980 ti, and if he still thinks otherwise then he should prove it (which he won't be able to)

That depends on your definition of “close” obviously

By "close" I mean run Ghost Recon Wild Lands at NATIVE 4k (which means nothing below 2160p or 3840x2160) with the same High graphics quality preset and be able to maintain at least 30fps average (let alone 35fps which a STOCK GTX 980 Ti is capable of holding), I'm still waiting for that proof.

So that’s your definition of close? One game? And a game that obviously has Dynamic Resolution so you already put yourself in a no lose situation...

And than it needs to average 30 FPS? When you know damn well it’s vsync locked to 30 because nobody wants screen tearing. Wouldn’t minimum be the fairer barometer If it’s vsync locked to 30 max...

oh of course not because a 980ti dips to 24 FPS on “High” at 4K, a setting that could very well be higher on X1X

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@Grey_Eyed_Elf said:
@Gatygun said:
@Johnny-n-Roger said:
@Dark_sageX said:

He knows he lost, he just can't bring himself to admit it, I mean really? "xbox equal to 980 ti" pfff, what a peasant.

And a PS4 Pro is better than a PC with a GTX 970.

lol nope

Crazy people here... The PS4 Pro is a RX 470 and aftermarket RX 470's get destroyed by stock GTX 970's, and the PS4 Pro runs it at lower clocks along with a weak CPU. A i5 with a aftermarket 970 will undoubtedly give you better performance.

And yet Horizon Zero Dawn on a 4K Display looks better than anything a 970 can spit out on a 4K Display

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@Dark_sageX said:
@Juub1990 said:
@Dark_sageX said:

He knows he lost, he just can't bring himself to admit it, I mean really? "xbox equal to 980 ti" pfff, what a peasant.

Yeah it's really not equal to a 980 Ti. Not even close in fact. The 980 Ti is 3-5% slower than the 1070 at stock speeds which is in turn 30-40% faster than a 1060. I can concede the X1X has a faster GPU than the 1060 by 5-15% but nowhere near 30%. With a good overclock a 980 Ti can also gain a 20%+ bump in performance which will make it effectively 50% faster than a 1060 at stock speeds. The better ones can actually enter 1080 territory in terms of performance. The X1X is a tier below. Nowhere near it.

Sad thing is that 15% over the GTX 1060 will only be on paper, because in the real world we will never see that number, thanks to the CPU bottlenecking

At 4K the X1X is more capable than a 1060, and bottleneckiNg has yet to be shown

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@NVIDIATI said:

@GioVela2010 So I assume this is just another claim you can't support?

@NVIDIATI said:
@GioVela2010 said:
@appariti0n said:

Makes sense. Phone cpus are getting to the point where they rival console cpus.

Android CPU/GPU’s re still shit tho

iphone Master Race

What does your iPhone score in 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme?

All I see is iOS domination.

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

@kozio said:
@Vaasman said:

Mod can we please leave the banned shitposters banned? Why the hell do we need some clown crawling back up through their account grave every month or so? Is the forum that desperate for traffic?

Looks like all these xbox threads are coming from one guy.

negative, i only have 2 accounts

Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

[QUOTE="IgGy621985"]

PC gaming died with the last console generation.

And then it got out of its grave and got undead.

Now it lurks under your bed when you sleep.

bed_monster.jpg

uninspiredcup

 

Stop this madness.

Agreed, hermits make awful posts
Avatar image for m3Boarder32
m3Boarder32

9526

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

4

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 m3Boarder32
Member since 2002 • 9526 Posts

It´s weird. Consolites are paying to much attention to PC despite the fact that they don´t care about pc gaming :P

If PC is so bad, why are you making so many threads about PC. 

jhonMalcovich
Because it's so bad! Duh!