m3Boarder32's forum posts
Says who? Lmao That isnnotmpart of the meta rules[QUOTE="GioVela2010"][QUOTE="Lumpy311"]
Because it wasn't reviewed for the PC, hence, it gets the score the console versions got.
CaseyWegner
if you were going by the meta rules you wouldn't be talking about multiplats. :|
2nd place for PC :)Ahh yes, i missed the part that leaves it to the discrection of the moderators! Like i said, I've never broken any of the specific examples they later list. What a coincidence.[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="lostrib"]
you missed a part in your quote above: "Behavior that disrupts the Service for other users, intentional or not, is prohibited."
And this can be broadly interpreted, hence the part that says "This includes, but is not limited to"
lostrib
that's why it says includes but not limited to. Â If all you do is go into threads and post about your plasma and then call everyone peasants and derail the thread, then that probably falls under disruptive posting/forum invasion. Â Or you could just go to moderation clarification thread and ask about it so you know how to avoid it next time. Â It sounds like these new TOU changes aren't the reason you've been moderated in the past
So if a PC gamer is bragging about how much more powerful his PC is, and I say "LMAO too bad you're connecting to a shitty LCD" you think I should get moderated for that? That is ridiculous IMO[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="kinectthedots"]:lol: there is no lie to be found in my post.ÂHes lying anyway, dude is assuming that every unscored PC game would score the same as the console version. When in fact many of these unscored PC Games are broken messy garbage or are missing essential modes or multiplayer found in the superior console versions Having a conversation with yourself might be considered crazy. I'm kinectthedots now too? lmaoI gusess the lying comment was aimed at yourself.
-Unreal-
Doesnt say that in the TOU[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Actually... [QUOTE="Verbtex"]Forum invasion is the term we use for posts which are disruptive, only intend to annoy / call out users, or are repetitive.lostrib
you missed a part in your quote above: "Behavior that disrupts the Service for other users, intentional or not, is prohibited."
And this can be broadly interpreted, hence the part that says "This includes, but is not limited to"
Ahh yes, i missed the part that leaves it to the discrection of the moderators! Like i said, I've never broken any of the specific examples they later list. What a coincidence.[QUOTE="m3Boarder32"]And why does System Wars have it's own "Rules Thread" if these rules are contradicted by the Superseding Gamespot TOU? It makes no sense at all. If the System Wars rule say you can call somebody a dumbass, why wouldnt you also be able to call somebody a peasant? verbtex
That Survival Guide and Rules thread is outdated.
So erase it then, why still have it there? Whats the purpose of still being viewable to forum users?
Log in to comment