Well or more. who know i think it as more potentials. well let see ATI Come up with video card if it DEFEAt nvidia.
Id Think also maybe 15% Or osmeitng like +6-7 FPS. If that the case it still a major improvement. on 1920x1200
only 1/5 of peopel who make a epxneisve pc GO TO 2500x1600 to the simple fact
it 30 inch : it Large : IT Cost more then 1000$ or Pound To get a SYSTEm TO WORK with 30fPS + at 2500x1600
I think in 2 year 2500x1600 gona be a better Standart for video card : 1920x1200 is the current best (high end standart)

Lot of video card endle it pretty good on SLI & Tri Sli for no lag
While unless you TRI SLI the D260GTX OR 280GTX OC I doesn't know if you could run a game like Cryis 2500x1600 60fps.
all Very high. :( that the point im disapionted. i mean if you pay that much it should AT LAST ? Run . The GAme 2500x1600 : 60FPS : + The setting to it max :-/ But Back to 1920x1200
D(serie + are the only tos upport the future of monitor incoming end 2009 : 10 Bits Color = higher then current 110% Gamut pc monitor. a bit i think & more perfect & 120 hz which is make the Boom Effect & All those GREAt SFX far Greater but maybe the NEW NVIDIA incoming With gDDR5 in 2009 : Gona Endle well the 10bits : 3200x1500 monitor or the rumour talk about at 120hz
it possible it only 2500x1600 or 1920x1200 the resolution people cna afford at 120hz 10 bits
This is another topic. but it RELATEd TO the Geforce Serie D260+ Maybe a D280GX2 Quad sli ? or D300 : GX2 By 2009 with gDDR5 That would be awsome lol marcthpro

That is possibly the worst thing I have ever read.

What I'm lolling about, is the fact everyone said I wasted my money when I bought my GX2. I said all along these cards would fail, and the 280 is a fair lol for price. I payed $600 AU for my GX2, which isn't too much more than 8800s in SLi. With that much money I wouldnt even get 1 of these cards, I could almost quad SLi for the price of one.

NICE Nvidia.

Starcraft 2 will sell A LOT of copies. Think about how many people loved starcraft one, you could almost call it a 'cult hit', there was a period where you didnt hear anything but starcraft.

Spore = meh, I've lost interest in the game, looks like it's going to be a lot more casual than it sounded when it was announced originally.

[QUOTE="maartyr"]

How does he win? All of it's personal opinion, but most people that have played both will say that AoC isn't ready yet, until it gets a lot more content, people wont leave WoW for it. Most people I know wont sub to conan when their month's over.

Conan will be dead in a year, where as WoW will likely have a whole new fan base when WoTLK comes out. Same as Vanguard, LOTRO etc.

Ein-7919

You do realize that your complaint is EXACTLY the same problem that plagued WoW back when it was released. There was ZERO content beyond Stratholm, there were missing textures, and some of the classes were borked (paladins and Seal of the Crusader as well as Reckoning bombs come immediately to mind). You know what happened? Bliz released patches and content patches that fixed/addressed many of the complaints. And you know something? FunCom has already stated that they are working on adding more content for end game (which is exactly what Bliz did at WoW's release).

Now, I've been playing WoW since the open beta, and I view AoC to be a breath of fresh air. Admittedly, if you think that combat is just jamming down the 1, 2, and 3 keys, you're either doing something wrong or you haven't played the game. Relying on the basic 1, 2, 3 attacks will have you dying MANY times. Triggering appropriate debuffing combos at the right time is key to coming out the victor in combat.

As for the difficulty levels, they're roughly the same challenge-wise. Both WoW AND AoC rely on formulaically pressing certain skills. Unfortunately, I can only speak from my experience in pre-TBC raid encounters, but MC, AQ20, ZG, and (to some extent) BWL became extremely forumlaic. It's just the nature of computer gaming. It happens in EVERY game I've EVER played. Once you get the build order, spell order, attack order, weapon loadout, or (in FPS games) the right weapon/character combination, you're not going to deviate from the winning pattern.

[QUOTE="-wildflower-"]

See, now you did it, you made all the wee WoW-tards throw a hissy fit by criticizing their little crayola, paint-by-numbers game.

Yeah boys, have fun grinding those same boring instances over and over and over while the rest of us play something that is actually good (and fun). Oh my! The best thing I can say about WoW is that it keeps all these raging e-peen types in one place so that they don't infect the rest of the gaming population. They're just too hardcore and complicated for the rest of us.

-Unreal-

Well at least you came in with at least a couple of comments to back up your opinion. :roll:

You're throwing a hissy fit by the way, that's why you had to blow off steam by flaming other people in the thread. You couldn't handle an argument so you had to start throwing insults.

They can't come up with an arguement because they've got nothing to back it up with.

while the rest of us play something that is actually good (and fun).

-wildflower-

Personal opinion. How is it better than wow? Dont say the conbat, it gets tedious and annoying after a while. Have you leveled an AoC character above 50? It just dies in the a**, I was having a bit of fun, then bam, nothing. Not to mention there's a massive influx of terrible PvP players that try and gank you, then you beat them after you've had your back to them and they cry cheats. Poor.

AoC will suffer the same fate as vanguard, tabula rasa, LOTRO. In a year's time, lets compare the fanbase shall we?

How does he win? All of it's personal opinion, but most people that have played both will say that AoC isn't ready yet, until it gets a lot more content, people wont leave WoW for it. Most people I know wont sub to conan when their month's over.

Conan will be dead in a year, where as WoW will likely have a whole new fan base when WoTLK comes out. Same as Vanguard, LOTRO etc.

[QUOTE="maartyr"]

3) Without dying? Did someone roll on PvE and expect a challenge? Very sad bro. Next time, step it up and try to take on some level 20s at level 10. It's possible, but not easy.

GodLovesDead