Abominable Analysis
by mack10 on Comments
Initializing: Apocryphal analysis abuses ambitious arrangement, as an animal abruptly attacks and annihilates. Approaching an article atrociously attains aught; analysis asks acknowledgement, and appropriatley attains admitting. At an age arraying ample aptitude, armies attack aiming appropriately. Translation: False examination harms driven product, like an animal immediatley attacking and killing it's prey (what a metaphor huh!?). Reading a (gamespot) review, with no real reason but to put someone down, results in nothing; analysis requires acknowledgement, and appropriatley deserves it. Explanation: My point here being: If people are going to criticize reviews without an open mind, just don't. Also, if people are going to write reviews without an open mind, just don't. I run accross too many reviews that are lacking in thought and effort it sickens me (so to speak); likewise, I run across many good reviews, well thought out and well written that end up getting too many (do not recommend this review) clicks. Result: I'm sure not many people here care, but there are good writers on Gamespot, and if people are going to put them down by intently judging their good reviews bad, we end up with more idiots and less writers. I hope people actually read a review before giving it bad recommendation (because of the score that certain reviewer gave that certain game). P.S.: Which paragraph you like better, the original or the translated one? I'm sure something in the first one doesn't make sense, but whatever, it sounds better. (heheheh!)