@Tamz: Agreed. Such a great game in my opinion. I love the DMC series, but the only other one I thought was great and is still one of the best action games is the third one.
The first one I think is really dated, but still pretty good with terrible voice acting. I really had to push myself to get through the second one, I just wanted it to end.
I played the fourth one a long time ago and never beat it, so I don't remember what I thought of it.
With all that said, I'm excited for this one. The combat looks really fluid and satisfying.
Can't wait to pay to play online! This is what I've been waiting for guys. I mean, this whole time I was like...if they've been able to offer online for free, why not make some money off of it? So excited!!
Really looking foward to this game since the first trailer. This guy makes me want to buy it even more. Taking risks is what pushes creativity. People think it's dumb that it's only co-op, but there are plenty of other games out there that have optional co-op. This game obviously takes it to the next level by designing the game around two human players.
So I guess a hacker group hacking Playstation's Twitter account and pretty much threatening that they also compromised PSN's database is no cause for alarm; because maybe, just maybe, they're lying and they didn't really compromise PSN. No need to change my password or feel concerned or anything, because a lot of these comments I've been reading here say that there's pretty much no correlation between a hacked Twitter account and a threatening message about another potential hack.
Is it possible that PSN wasn't hacked? Yeah, probably. Is it possible that it was or will be hacked? Yeah, probably. PSN's security is way better than Twitter's; there's no possible way these hackers also breached Playstation's security...right? I mean, let's say a bank's twitter account, (do banks even have twitter accounts?), was in the same situation; their account posted a threatening tweet about compromising the bank's database. Is there no cause for alarm because Twitter's security sucks compared to the bank's?
@joshrmeyer: My last sentence suggests that I am paying for ps plus, but I'm not. Should've said, "It feels like I WOULD be paying..." My mistake. I know what you mean though; what I'm saying is that I don't care about those deals and what not. I just want the online multiplayer.
Actually, they should just have it like it was before where online was free and ps plus was an extra thing if you wanted it.
The problem I have with PS plus and Xbox live is having to pay to play online. I always see people say, "If you can't afford $60 a year to play online, you shouldn't be gaming anyways." Get out of here man! I can afford it, but I'm not paying extra cash to access a mode of the game I already paid $60 for. Think about it, you paid $60 for a game, right? You pop in the disc or download it, you boot up the main menu and you see all these game modes; single-player campaign, split-screen, multiplayer, options, horde mode, etc. You're telling me I have to pay an extra $60 to unlock a mode to the game I thought I had full access to when I already paid $60?
I know people say, "Well it gets you free games every month and good discounts, that's what you're really paying for." You're paying for free games? If it's free then I shouldn't have to pay for it. I know that it's a way better deal to pay $60 a year for 24 games a year, but most of those games, I don't even want. My other point is that all I want IS the online multiplayer, I really don't care about the discounts and "free games". For me it feels like I'm paying $60 to use one feature of the "service".
I can't wait to be one of those lucky people who gets to pre-order a gaming console! I've been waiting for a lucky opportunity like this to show up since the Switch was announced. I hope I'm lucky!
magmia's comments