mahmoudddd's forum posts

Avatar image for mahmoudddd
mahmoudddd

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 mahmoudddd
Member since 2012 • 47 Posts

Erm, what? It's a console FPS.FrozenLiquid

Was. During the PS2 era.

Things change. If it requires a PC to reboot the series, then it will be a PC exclusive. It's not a problem.

Avatar image for mahmoudddd
mahmoudddd

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 mahmoudddd
Member since 2012 • 47 Posts

it's simple; console constructor only release games that they think will sell

sony was almost about to throw demon's souls in the trash bin because it was such an alien concept and game for the consoles

demon's souls turned out to be the best ps3 exclusive out there

many other awesome projects were actually canned and never saw the light of the day

those console constructors don't see time splitters are a good investment, and the open nature of the PC platform allow the dev do make the game in a hassle free environement (don't have to pay royalties to anyone, many different means of distribution) and if anything, they could even start a kick starter campaign at worst

you know, the thing that doesn't exist for consoles?

Avatar image for mahmoudddd
mahmoudddd

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 mahmoudddd
Member since 2012 • 47 Posts

[QUOTE="mahmoudddd"]

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Of course, the PS3 can run Witcher 2 like a big guy lifting a small weight. It just boils down to the developer really. They are just scared of working with PS3 which indicates lack of skills and talent on their part.

Maneil99

dodge the fact that i have destroyed all your claims that the ps3 is omre powerful than the xbox

just dodge it!

also witcher 2 is infinitely better game than uncharted hah

The witcher 2 is not being ported to ps3 because it would take to much man power to port to new architecture. Are you stupid/ they are a smaller dev team. Stop posting biased links to forums as facts before you get banned. Its ad really, trying to justify you lies with 2nd hand sources.

You are being dense my friend, i am not the one who posted the forum links about the PS3 not being able to do this or that, i posted forum links about naughty dog's Q and A concerning the PS2 and sly games. Let me re paste them for you.

naughty dog said that uncharted 1 used only like 40 or 50% of the PS3's power

now, when you google for the q and a concerning sly and the ps2, here's what naughty dog says

http://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=1084227&start=40

http://forums.gametrailers.com/thread/there-s-no-such-thing-as-using/541952

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=55634&page=18

http://www.xbox360forum.com/xbox-forum/threads/86078-Official-quot-Killzone-2-quot-General-Discussion-Thread/page4

all these forum posts have talked about naughty dog's take on blowing smoke about percentage usage for the ps2

they then themselves proceed to blow smoke with the ps3 and uncharted

admit it, you're in denial, naughty dog lied and sony also lied

this link http://www.naughtydog.com/jak1/20Questions.htm is not available anymore, naughty dog took it down

they are not bull crap links, they only show that naughty dog lied out of its butt for uncharted 1

Avatar image for mahmoudddd
mahmoudddd

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 mahmoudddd
Member since 2012 • 47 Posts

TimeSplitters 4 being PC exclusive sounds stupid, considering it's gameplay was built around consoles.nintendoboy16

and console gamers are stupid because they don't want games like time splitters on consoles

Avatar image for mahmoudddd
mahmoudddd

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 mahmoudddd
Member since 2012 • 47 Posts

[QUOTE="mahmoudddd"]

[QUOTE="Maneil99"]

You sound amd look like an idiot. not picking sides by never in that quote did kojima say MSG4 was possible for xbox so I have no idea why you would post that. Gears 3 is not on par with Uncharted and Halo 4 does not reach the Level Killzone 3 reached 1 year ago. Want screenies, I can bring them out

GamerwillzPS

old idiot? because i can afford all the gaming platforms i ever wanted?

i'm just not a retarded fanboy, that is all

you didn't answer my question: why does the ps3 can't run the witcher 2?

Of course, the PS3 can run Witcher 2 like a big guy lifting a small weight. It just boils down to the developer really. They are just scared of working with PS3 which indicates lack of skills and talent on their part.

dodge the fact that i have destroyed all your claims that the ps3 is omre powerful than the xbox

just dodge it!

also witcher 2 is infinitely better game than uncharted hah

Avatar image for mahmoudddd
mahmoudddd

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 mahmoudddd
Member since 2012 • 47 Posts

and if sony knew how to make consoles, vita would be selling like hot cakes right now, right?

and they wouldn't have choosed the cell, it's has an architecture very different than what the other paltform uses

it's useless to go for the odd things, it just makes things harder for developers

did you know that the ps3 can't run witcher 2 like the xbox 360 does?

oh and if KZ2 only used 60% of ps3's power, then why does the multiplayer part of the game slows down to a slideshow? surely using 100% of the ps3 would allow to have NO slow down whatsoever

Avatar image for mahmoudddd
mahmoudddd

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 mahmoudddd
Member since 2012 • 47 Posts

[QUOTE="Shockwave-DASH"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

My evidences should be sufficient to end this thread. So I'm outta of here.

To the guy who mentioned about some multiplats don't run well on PS3, this is because developers can't make games. Lack of programming skills contributed to this. There are devs who said that PS3 is not hard to develop for, they are the ones who made games on both consoles which are almost identical.

Evidence 1

Evidence 2

That should suffice. Don't blame the PS3. Blame the devs.

Man, I think I've won the argument! :cool:

No evidence otherwise you are bullsh!t.

GamerwillzPS

PS3 Can't handle Splinter Cell:http://www.psu.com/forums/showthread.php/86797-Splinter-Cell-producer-PS3-can-t-handle-AI-nearly-as-well-as-the-360 Ps3 can't handle Skyrim: http://roosterteeth.com/members/journal/entry.php?id=2839294 PS3 can;t handle Uncharted 4: http://gamerant.com/uncharted-4-ps3-ps4-hold-110635/ PS3 can;t handle rpgs: http://www.amazon.com/forum/video%20games?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx1T1DM93QU4XL1&cdThread=TxDSL5IQ642LYF PS3 can;t run original Splinter Cell at 1080p: http://www.gog.com/en/forum/general/ps3_cant_even_run_the_original_splinter_cell_at_1080p The Gunstringer is not possible on PS3: http://n4g.com/news/844346/the-gunstringer-not-possible-on-wii-or-ps3 Mods are possible on Xbox but not Ps3: http://www.nextgenupdate.com/forums/universal-dumpster/532560-how-mods-possible-xbox-but-not-ps3.html Cross Game chat not possilble on PS3: http://article.wn.com/view/2011/08/20/Crossgame_chat_not_possible_on_PS3_coming_to_Vita/ Last Story not possible on PS3: http://www.vgchartz.com/article/83545/the-last-story-not-possible-anywhere-other-than-on-wii/ Super Meatboy not possible on PS3: http://www.psu.com/a010087/PS3-Super-Meat-Boy-not-at-all-possible,-says-dev-?page=0 This is enough proof to sure the PS3 had more problems with hardware and running games then the Xbox and I have more evidence than you do! Ha, the PS3 can;t run the GUNSTRINGER. Just sad really.

Lol, you posted some opinionated forum pages in there. :lol: Go for real articles like I did.

Sorry but it seems that you have no proof so that you are forced to use other forums to back your argument up. However, some of your sources are good but they are not enough to compete with mine.

Both consoles indeed do have their strengths and weaknesses, but I got to admit that PS3 has more strengths than weaknesses unlike the 360, and those strengths are vital.

Sony knows how to design a proper gaming console.

http://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=1084227&start=40

http://forums.gametrailers.com/thread/there-s-no-such-thing-as-using/541952

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=55634&page=18

http://www.xbox360forum.com/xbox-forum/threads/86078-Official-quot-Killzone-2-quot-General-Discussion-Thread/page4

all these forum posts have talked about naughty dog's take on blowing smoke about percentage usage for the ps2

they then themselves proceed to blow smoke with the ps3 and uncharted

admit it, you're in denial, naughty dog lied and sony also lied

this link http://www.naughtydog.com/jak1/20Questions.htm is not available anymore, naughty dog took it down

why?

it went against sony's PR bullcrap

did you know that the first xbox titles only used 1, sometimes 2 cores at best? Using only 2 or 4 threads to make the game run

of course you will not admit this, you're a sony fanboy

Avatar image for mahmoudddd
mahmoudddd

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 mahmoudddd
Member since 2012 • 47 Posts

The thing is, if Sony tried to keep the launch price down, there wouldn't be Blu-ray. Our exclusives would have been different and inferior like the 360.

I expect the PS4 to be priced reasonably as Blu-ray have been around for a while, so the price for the drive won't be as high.

I spent the launch price, and I have to say it was worth it. It's one hell of a console!

GamerwillzPS

The big majority of PS3 games don't fill the entire blue ray

only a few games do, they are the ones that span many dvds (like rage)