[QUOTE="marvelfan"]

Using Head tracking technique you wouldn't need costly 3D displays, and in combination with motion control systems you would have one hell of a gaming experience.

Here is a video of the Head tracking Technique.

Youtube link

HuusAsking

Huh?

Did you watch the Vid? It tells you everything you need to know. Of coarse the tv doesn't move, the program your watching moves with relation to you're head i.e Eyes

Like if you where looking at a CG face on the screen, as you move to your right the face would turn to show you more of the left side of it's face. If you where to keep walking to your right and to the side of the tv or behind it you wouldn't see anything because you wouldn't be looking at the tv anymore, the effect only takes place on the screen.

Using Head tracking technique you wouldn't need costly 3D displays, and in combination with motion control systems you would have one hell of a gaming experience.

Here is a video of the Head tracking Technique.

Youtube link

Most people used to channel surf by going from channel to channel, now most people use guides to do there surfing, the guide brings up a list of the channels in groups of like ten or so. So you prob wouldn't being saying " Next channel, next channel, over and over again. You would most likely have list of channels that you pre programed to show, and genres list that you would set up. Would be more like " show Sci-fi list, or sports list please, or favorites " for voice control. And or " show list of all action movies playing now".

And a good way to keep mistake's from being made is to give the interface a name that starts the control process, i.e "Lucy" (program starts listening to you now) show all football games playing today.

I'm not saying natal would have any of this stuff im just saying that for it to get to a point where remotes are no longer needed you would need a pretty advanced program to make everything run smooth, i don't see this happening for another 5-10 years for it to be in every home.

I doubt that there will be no monthly fee, but it's still in the TBD, maybe they will go for a cheaper $9.99 fee instead of the standard $14.99. It may not be free but hey it's better then 15 bucks.

That would be awsome if it was free, but thats just wishfull thinking. There is no way in hell it's going to be free, there is just to much money to be had for a mmorpg with the name brand of Final Fantasy.

Pretty much just what most people are saying, make it not such a Grind fest. Took me like a year and a half of semi-casual playing to get to 60,with WoW got to lvl 60 in like 3 months. But FFXI was my first MMORPG, got it with the PS2 and played it for about 2 years, other then the Grinding and difficulty of finding a party to grind with, I think it was one of the best and most fun MMORPG iv ever played, but that might be just because it was my first. I barely play WoW any more, and if FFXIV turns out to be any good I will prob drop WoW for it.

Im sorry but you are blind of you think MGS4 is the only good game on the PS3, if you havn't tried any of these games then your opinion dosn't count for anything.

Unless you are an elitest who thinks that a game isn't worth playing unless it has a AAA AAAA score. I Feel sorry for people who do that, they are missing out on so much.