Personally, I thought that...
They are both funny
Equally good(meaning they are good) graphics
R-C has better music and presentation
R-C has more weapons, more unique levels
R-C is not as mind-bustingly hard (though if you crank up the difficulty, it gets quite hard, especially UYA's final level) and Jak games are like, well, HARD. God, I almost hated the third Jak because it was uninterseting, hard and you had to do levels OVER and OVER and the desert theme was horrible.
Second Jak, I spent six bucks renting that game. I get to the first or second segment, where you are chased by that robot with the spikey wheel, and it goes into it's vision. It took me like 20 minutes to get there, and I spent two hours trying to get past that one part. I spent days and the farthest I got on it was to the part where you swing on the poles. I hate that one.
first one was good. No guns, but good.
R-C: First one was a strong start to a great series.
Second one was very good. Cool weapons and very neat levels, and it's puzzles were tricky but not overly challenging. Nice use of gadgets too, but a little too easy(skill points aside, those are always a little tough to get)
Third one was peronally, my favorite. A blast. Neat, colorful levels, sweet, destructive new weapons, cool upgrades, Just right on the terms of challenge, great bosses, a minigame, and a lot of funny stuff. The multiplayer tries to be a lot different than the game, and it isn't particulaly good. But great anyways.
Numero Quatro was fun, but real short. It is also a lot harder. Cool upgrade and alpha mod system. The gameplay has went from a platformer/action-adventure to an action-shooter. Great shooting action, and co-op is good. Same so-so multiplayer, with a few good upgrades.
R-C FTW!
Log in to comment