iloved both but after playing fallout 3 so much i am ready to go back to the midieval era with good old swords and bows.

Capcom knows that if you make the same game with better graphics, nobody is going to buy it. that is why they changed the game so much in Resident Evil 4. they were trying to make another change in RE5, and imo it looks like they did a really good job. i guess i will find out in a week.

[QUOTE="jeroentje001"]

It's a good review, don't get me wrong from the start... But I really hate the fact they keep mentioning that it's not a traditional resident evil game. They say it's not scary, you don't have to watch your ammo, it's more action-packed... There are also a lot of comment froms gamers like: "Resident Evil is dead for me", "I don't like it because they changed it" ," That's it I'm buying dead space", "I don't want an action-game, I want RE"...

Face it, Resident Evil has evolved. It has evolved from a pure survival horror game to a fantastic mix of the action and survival horror genre. It's no longer survival horror, it's survival action. And if you don't like that, then don't buy it. It's simple, RE has moved on to the future and is trying to mix different genres of games. I personally like it and I think it's great that the developpers are trying out new stuff on the next gen-consoles.

It would be very boring if every developper would just create simple sequels but with nicer graphics on the next-gen consoles.

So I applaud for Capcom and their courage to create a unique sequel and moving the RE-franchise into the future.

CTRL +C and CTRL + V

dthach614

learn to use some proper english. "we have a right to complaint," "we are allow to voice our opinions," "resident evil didn't evolved." haha, are you asian?

none of those--although they are good. i would have to say fallout 3 or oblivion, its a hard choice.