modsblowdick's forum posts

Avatar image for modsblowdick
modsblowdick

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 modsblowdick
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

you can do more in tresspasser than you can in crysis.

like i said video games are just getting stale and software isnt evolving fast enough with technology.

Avatar image for modsblowdick
modsblowdick

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 modsblowdick
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="gerbaburba"]

crysis is a pretty good looking game...i run it on max..but there's still alot of flaws to the graphics alot of textures could of been replaced with better ones.

but if crysis really is the best looking video game on the market then damn video games havent evolved much.

Mckenna1845

name one other game, that has the graphical quality of crysis, the draw distance of crysis, the amount of freedom as crysis, the physics of crysis. graphics have evolved greatly, i mean the best last gen shall we say was doom3 or fear, and they was linear, and had nowhere near the graphics of crysis.

far cry?

it was cool first time around..but it's just feels like i been there done that with crysis.

the only thing that impressed me was the ability to shoot a tree anywhere basically and have it fall or shoot it into sections..but you can only shoot down small/palm trees basically though.

everything else i had seen before in a video game before basically.

sure the models look good but still have flaws.

the actual levels have alot of flaws/bad textures the actual level's arent designed very interestingly.

the levels arent as big as people make them out to be the levels has invisible barriers if you cross the game will kill you

it's just way overrated of a game and getting too much credit.

probley most realistic looking game...but i dont think it's the best looking game.

video game's just havent evolved much in the past 5 years