mydadsdirtysock's forum posts

Avatar image for mydadsdirtysock
mydadsdirtysock

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 mydadsdirtysock
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
I have Final Fantasy II and III for SNES and Secret of Mana (2 copies). Also Chrono Trigger which sorta lost its luster without being shrink wrapped and unopened. Oh well.
Avatar image for mydadsdirtysock
mydadsdirtysock

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 mydadsdirtysock
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

I stopped reading after the Halo Wars hate popped up. I'm not saying you have to like the game, but you have to at least realize that it was an interesting way to expand the series. If anything, that's exactly how developers should handle their franchises.

AtomicTangerine
Well I guess it could have been way worse if you look at it. We could have had Halo Kart, Halo Kombat, or even Halo Hero. Ok ok.....I concede. Halo Wars isn't the worst thing they could have done. I'm just not a Strategy kinda guy. Shouldn't bash what I don't know. My bad.
Avatar image for mydadsdirtysock
mydadsdirtysock

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 mydadsdirtysock
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
Still Halo 3. But only for multiplayer. Could only take so much of the campaign.
Avatar image for mydadsdirtysock
mydadsdirtysock

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 mydadsdirtysock
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

I agree with your points 100% but there's a few things to add.

Problem is the economy is tough, look at Midway, your example. Dishing out something new and expinsive that may not work is a huge risk that can't be taken by any publisher/developer. The fact is many are losing sales and getting less money so the only way to survive till the economy develops is by garunteeing money ie. milking the current franchises with an established fanbase that's guarenteed to buy the game. This strategy sucks but keeps business running and seeing how the cost of the game is rising they need to either raise the price which if your not a CoD, Guitar Hero or Halo game is something that will kill you so the only thing is to ensure high sales figures and piracy doesn't help.

CyberAltair5
\ My solution for this is using these simple words........ the new game being released by Midway could have "From the makers of Mortal Kombat" somewhere in Bold print. New game by Bungie could read............"From the guys that brought you Halo: CE, Halo 2, and Halo 3" People buy into those little statements. Now to make that a perfect scenerio, the games can't suck or their reputation gets crushed for trying to pawn off a new title with the help of the Halo or Mortal Kombat name. It works for movies and tv shows. Why not games? Just a suggestion.
Avatar image for mydadsdirtysock
mydadsdirtysock

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 mydadsdirtysock
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
Sorry I don't have the quoting basics down yet for this website. I will in due time. Happy posting.
Avatar image for mydadsdirtysock
mydadsdirtysock

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 mydadsdirtysock
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="muthsera666"][QUOTE="mydadsdirtysock"] Well, Halo Wars got good reviews pretty well across the board... And they aren't doing the same thing with ODST. It's actually trying a different gaming narrative, and the active player isn't going to be a Spartan, so the gaming style should be pretty different as well. Three of the games played pretty much the exact same way, and those are the ones you say that you loved. With the other three, they're changing the way the game is played, and you think that's a bad thing. Personally, I love the mythos behind the Halo games, and I'm game to try the new games. [Yes Halo Wars got a good review. I didn't bash this game, nor did I bash ODST or Reach. I'm just saying that instead of throwing together a strain of Halo titled games (which I said I loved), why can't they be a totally different title by Bungie or whoever. I'm not a fan of the style laid out for Halo Wars. Maybe I shouldn't have called it garbage, but I was ranting. Leave me be. Haha. I'm just saying that a strategy Halo game probably wasn't needed, but the Halo name alone (not to mention the chance to play the new maps 3 months early, sure helped it excel) I pretty much agree with everything you said there, but all good things are supposed to end sometime. You might as well go out on top. Halo 3 was that opportunity. *on a side note, I will be getting ODST and Reach, my sole argument is that the series was supposed to be a trilogy, now its gonna have 6 titles.]
Look what happened to Midway. It's pretty much non-existent now.mydadsdirtysock
I don't think that was directly and only due to rehashing Mortal Kombat... [Yeah, the fall of Midway wasn't directly Mortal Kombat's fault. Wouldn't have hurt if they would have tried to go a different direction for a change. Then some fresh ideas could have led to a new franchise being introduced that could have gave them life before death. I know that's just a maybe, but that approach could have worked better than firing up a Mortal Kombat reincarnation party every 2 or 3 years. Oh well, what's done is done.]
So the point I'm trying to make here is, instead of making hundreds of games and having a few gems and new originals in the mix that are worth it, why don't they devote more toward a game that gamers will almost definitely buy.mydadsdirtysock
So, you complain that people buy trash, and then you complain that companies need to make games people will buy. According to you, they already are. As consumers in capitalism, we vote with our money. If you don't like the gmae, don't buy it. If enough people feel the same way, the company will seee that the consumer isn't happy. If people are happy with new installments in gaming worlds they enjoy, why do you have the right to say they are wrong.

[Not did not once say people buy trash. Obviously some people do, but I never said that. For example, the Xbox 360 only had 20 games in the last 6 months with a rating of 8.0 and higher here on GameSpot. Only one reaching 9.0 (Street Fighter IV). Now either GameSpot is being harsh on the rating or the quality is lacking Imagine if only 10 of the 20 games were made. And of the 10 titles that were dropped, they came over and helped the 10 that were chosen to stay. My idea would be that those 8.0's had a chance of becoming 9 and higher with a little bit more time and devotion. Like I said before, less titles that are well polished will most likely have gamers picking those titles up. Rather than making the mistake of trying a new game and having that be the garbage I spoke of earlier. Once again, it's my opinion and I love to argue. Lets rock! To those of you who agreed, Yay for you!]
Avatar image for mydadsdirtysock
mydadsdirtysock

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 mydadsdirtysock
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
I am, by far, no expert here, but it seems to me the problem with the gaming industry is that they are all out to make a ton of money and the path they choose isn't always the best. We have 100's of games on all platforms that come out every month. Great for gamers right? I don't agree. Tons of options lead to a congested market. I know it's easy for me to sit here and say that, but why can't we go back to the days where sequels and spin offs are worth buying. Not these god awful games that are put together with glue and scotch tape. Take my favorite game for instance.....Halo 3. Halo 1 rocked. Halo 2 added multi-player. Halo 3 brought a conclusion to the trilogy and still has hundreds of thousands of people still playing almost 2 years after launch. That's about 6 years, three games done well. Shut it down, move on. Nope. Here comes Halo Wars. Garbage. In September, Halo: ODST prequel. Next year Halo: Reach, another prequel. This is just getting ridiculous. The Guitar Hero series is worst of all. At least Rock Band revamped the music genre (full band, nice tour, endless DLC, band battles,etc to keep things fresh) without really trying to shove a game down our throats every 3 months with the same setlist/encore, setlist/encore crap. Look what happened to Midway. It's pretty much non-existent now. Mortal Kombat one and two were new, solid games, but that series was driven directly into the ground without any real change in gameplay or characters. Scorpion and Sub-Zero were good original characters, but you change their colors to gray and you have Smoke. Go green and add some claws instead of feet and you have Reptile. Add the rainbow, you have Chameleon. What the hell? Same guys, different colors. No one wants that trash. Now the series is just a past time. And don't even get me started on Madden. Ever since the PS2, that series hasn't added anything worth it in years. I know that sports games are harder to be critical about since football is football, but still. The ratings show that every year they are getting lower and lower. MLB 09: The Show recontructed the baseball sim, why can't EA make Madden better? Oh well, they're still making money, who cares about us. That's another rant. So the point I'm trying to make here is, instead of making hundreds of games and having a few gems and new originals in the mix that are worth it, why don't they devote more toward a game that gamers will almost definitely buy. It's easy to say, but to have it done is one thing. You could compare this to the automotive industry. Everyone knows they are in the toilet now, but some companies are discontinuing cars, so less can be more. Less choices leaves more time devoted to making what's available, better. That could work if applied to games. More devotion to less games make them better in tons of ways. That leads to better competition and longer gameplay. That helps everyone. We pay less because we buy quality games with replay value, and game makers make more because they aren't putting out games that flop and don't meet expectations. This is an easy formula that won't be followed because we'll still have Viva Pinata 23, Guitar Hero: Hanson, Halo: Master Chief's Battle With Laundry, Madden 3000 (still with nothing fun added and horrible challenge calls), & Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 17. I could go on and on, but I won't. I rambled enough. Oh well, let them keep putting out garbage, and I'll just rip out my NES and SNES are relive the glory days when games were made right, and for us (not them).