n00bspank's forum posts

  • 17 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for n00bspank
n00bspank

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 n00bspank
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="n00bspank"]

I have been playing Company of Heroes with DX10 with resolution 1650x1080 all settings at max including the DX10-only "Ultra" setting where available, Direct3D 10 shader quality, and 8x antialiasing. It is playable at what I would judge to be about 30fps but not ideal. Anyway I was wondering what would be the bottleneck in my system that prevents higher frames in this game.

system specs are as follows:

Intel Core i7 920 Nehalem 2.66GHz processor

6GB (3x2) DDR2 1066 triple channel memory

Radeon HD 4870 512MB 256bit GDDR5

Angry_Bosmer

I would say DDR2 but i7s have low FSBs. Mobo? PSU?

Crap sorry it is DDR3 memory. My motherboard is listed in my signature if that matters... don't see How PSU could affect anything but it is a PC Power & Cooling 750W

Avatar image for n00bspank
n00bspank

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 n00bspank
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

So it just poor optomization on the game you think?

I wonder, even though my processor is quad core, the clock speed is not super high, so could overclocking help?

Avatar image for n00bspank
n00bspank

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 n00bspank
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

I have been playing Company of Heroes with DX10 with resolution 1650x1080 all settings at max including the DX10-only "Ultra" setting where available, Direct3D 10 shader quality, and 8x antialiasing. It is playable at what I would judge to be about 30fps but not ideal. Anyway I was wondering what would be the bottleneck in my system that prevents higher frames in this game.

system specs are as follows:

Intel Core i7 920 Nehalem 2.66GHz processor

6GB (3x2) DDR3 1066 triple channel memory

Radeon HD 4870 512MB 256bit GDDR5

Avatar image for n00bspank
n00bspank

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 n00bspank
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
hai, this thread is really old, lulz
Avatar image for n00bspank
n00bspank

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 n00bspank
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

You should try out Warcraft III The Frozen Throne.Link3301

Although this is a good game, most have been playing it for 6 years so you will not standa chance in multiplay with out much practice.

Just sayin'...

Avatar image for n00bspank
n00bspank

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 n00bspank
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
Being that the main point of MMO games is to play with other people, the fact that World of Warcraft has so many subscribers is the thing that makes it the best (not to mention the fact that the gameplay is very good, as is the support).
Avatar image for n00bspank
n00bspank

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 n00bspank
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

if you want to play Starcraft a lot

www.iccup.com

Huge community, you will get owned badly in the beginning though.

Edit: noobspank is so very wrong, modern games have almost more stupid AI then Starcraft ...

FuRRieT87
Starcraft units have terrible pathfinding, this is not good AI.
Avatar image for n00bspank
n00bspank

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 n00bspank
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
Only three World of Warcraft, Rome Total War, and Half-Life 2, but I only got my PC recently.
Avatar image for n00bspank
n00bspank

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 n00bspank
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
I really don't understand the appeal of Stracraft... sure I guess if you like to micromanage every single unit on the battlefield then it's good. Dosn't let you focus much on strategy or tactics though... lots of technique like a shooter game.
  • 17 results
  • 1
  • 2