@jedlicka:
Your rebuttals are about as deep as an eggcup, delibarate misquotes of what I've said, or emotional outbursts with little relevance.
They're not even worth replying to,
but to make a point for the benefit of anyone else reading,
I'll use just one example:

I said,
“...the modern American worker statistically closer to slavery than that of any other modern developed country on earth.”
And your insight into that was,
“Equating the modern American worker to slavery is just ridiculous”

Assuming a slave has zero flexibility, zero benefits, and zero pay in work,
you can use actual statistics to prove me right.
And from the richest country in the history of the world no less,
i.e. the country with the least potential excuses for it.
And how are the USA's unions? Basically dead.
It's literally, factually true.

So either you have a) severe reading comprehension problems,
b) serious critical thinking deficiencies,
c) you're a liar,
d) all of the above.
Whichever it is, come back when you can debate like an adult.
Bye.

So gambling then.

@BIG_BOSS_927: I'm guessing that's what you meant by the context in which you repeated it despite the fact it wasn't what you meant, twice in a row.

@BIG_BOSS_927: Right, I'm guessing then by the context in which you're bringing it up, by,
“The point being, unions most definitely have a need for certain positions and companies..."
what you meant was,
“The point being, unions most definitely serve a need for certain positions and companies..."
cause that's the only way I can understand it.

@BIG_BOSS_927: If you're doing well in your job, that's great,
but no one would ever say
that cars don't need seatbelts because I've never crashed.

“Generally if you show up to work and actually do your job, you'll be fine”
is fine for you to say about you,
maybe it's even fine for you to say about your company,
but to say it about the US or the western world in general
is very misguided and misinformed.

@thecupidstunts: You shouldn't jump to reductionism like that,
even if that's what the other person is doing.
It's a cheap form of debate that adds nothing and can work anywhere.
The point of comparison isn't to weigh two things that are the same.
Almost nothing comapres to Hitler,
but that doesn't mean that from Hitler we should learn nothing.