Still no 32 player conquest, ability to scroll wheel to gadgets, work on all medals at once, reimplement battlelog, a better stats page with comparison or 3rd party servers.

@realguitarhero5: yeah I got a Sapphire Nitro Fury non-x for pennies. Performs equally as well as my 980ti. Think it was $240. That's basically 1070 performance for cheaper than a 1060.

@sirnate54: This is a good article for PC noobs. You don't have to be a dickhole.

They could have avoided a rocky launch by making BF5 instead of this BF1 Great War crap...

Apology accepted. Sorry, I have fun arguing and you are a worthy foe.

I'm referring to what Microsoft claims to be awesome. They have no claims for TAA. This is a comparison on graphics between PS3 and Xbox360, I don't know whether you've gathered that or not, but since that is the question at hand I thought I'd comment on the Xbox's 4xAA being seemingly non-existant in these images.

Before you say anything about my typos (cause you seem like the type of fool who would comment on typing) the "they in the second sentence is supposed to be "Then" and the "lie is supposed to be "like". Isn't this whole article subjective "anyways"!?!?!

I know it was 4x, which is why I said 4x in the original post. They in a completely different post with different circumstances I doubled the original 4x (to 8x) just because I felt lie it.

Also I'm talking about anti-aliasing not temporal anti-aliasing. Anti-aliasing was developed for still images moron.

@XdavidCAssen23x When I take a BF2 screenshot with AA 8x and AA off they look drastically different. I hate it when people talk out their A...