Necorzed's forum posts

Avatar image for necorzed
Necorzed

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Necorzed
Member since 2014 • 25 Posts

No Games, broken multiplayer, games delayed all the time

and most of all the most idiotic fanbase

Greatness awaits, and waits, and wats

Avatar image for necorzed
Necorzed

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Necorzed
Member since 2014 • 25 Posts

@Heil68 said:

@sts106mat said:

@Krelian-co: you really are thick aren't you.

NAME A BIGGER SCI-FI FPS FRANCHISE

can you read that? or are you special needs?

I would say Mass Effect, WOW, Star Craft, Diablo all are bigger and in my opinion offer better cannon than Halo.

Not even close, Mass Effect ruined their canon with the Star Child circular BS logic, also the books are terrible.

Diablo 3 ruined their own lore when they killed off Cain, Star Craft and Wow have a good lore but Wow's books have been bad to decent, War Crimes was a terrible novel and was just used to lead into Warlords of Draenor;.

Starcraft, Diablo and Wow all follow a similar formula, giant evil entity is the biggest threat to the universe, Amon in Starcraft, Sargeras and the Old Gods in Wow, and Diablo and now Malthael

Starcraft 2 is now trying to make us think that Kerrigan is a good guy, despite the fact that she's killed millions of people, was freed from the zerg, voluntary went back to the zerg, killed millions of more people just to rescue her ex boyfriend and settle a grudge with someone. GG Blizzard.

Halo has had some stinkers in it's lore like Grasslands, but The Forerunner Trilogy, Cryptum, Primordium and Silentium are pretty much better than anything Mass Effect or Blizzard has to offer in terms of lore and story telling.

Avatar image for necorzed
Necorzed

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Necorzed
Member since 2014 • 25 Posts

@tormentos said:

@always_explicit said:

This collection is an absolute beast of entertainment. Only played CE so far but its a total transformation. 10/10 so far.

It has 88 already in Meta so apparently most reviewers didn't think that way.

Metacritic is probably the worst method of determing a game's quality. Especially since they factor in reviews that are more interested in click baiting than the review itself.

Gaming Age gave the game a C+ or a 58 because the multiplayer is broken, while it's a valid complaint the game still has 4 functioning camapaigns and playlist for each campaign that actually work.

Gaming Nexus was a joke review though, the guy whined about them not remaking Halo 3 and 4 but the kicker was when he said the multiplayer was the saving grace of the collection...you mean the same multiplayer that's barely functional right now?

Context of review >>> Number