[QUOTE="niccodemus"]

[QUOTE="zomglolcats"]Doubtful. I hated Oblivion, so I don't really think I'm going to like this.zomglolcats

That just means you didnt mod that **** to pieces!!!

True, I didn't. But then again, it's kind of a sad commentary on the game if you have to mod it to make it fun.

True...but i still thought it was pretty ok...or i dunno because i never really played it regular i modded since day 1

Doubtful. I hated Oblivion, so I don't really think I'm going to like this.zomglolcats

That just means you didnt mod that **** to pieces!!!

[QUOTE="niccodemus"][QUOTE="teardropmina"][QUOTE="biggest_loser"]

D3 won't be a fail financially - every man and his dog is going to buy that game.

teardropmina

not me and my cat. but yes, D3 won't fail, no matter how you define failure, except for probably the irrelvant discussion of CRPG definitions.

Maybe it wont flop major but it also wont get over an 8.5 Diciples 3 will prolly get a better rating than that but i think both games will suck and imo spore shoulda got a 6.5

it won't "flop" period, major or minor. Diablo battle chest is still selling, and up there with Sims2 and WoW variations all the time; battlenet is still active like crazy. when a game is popular and long lasting like this, review rating and individual gamer's sentiment is irrelvant. I don't diablo while gaming, but it's among the most successful PC game franchise ever. even if it somehow gets a 6 rating (which will not happen) cross board, D3 will still be extremely popular to the point that review ratings are irrelvant, be they *professional* or user.

I agree the old ones were popular but because its still selling doesnt mean its the best game ever lots of games still sell I buy old games a lot just because... whatever maybe it wont lose its regular fan base but i can say the minor graphic enchancements and so forth its gonna be like the old one i can see it now well maybe ill be wrong like i said halo had a steady fan base but that game was actually only ok it wasnt good it was like 1 and 2 i can name many more games that are like the original just modded up a bit and to me makes the game suck

[QUOTE="biggest_loser"]

D3 won't be a fail financially - every man and his dog is going to buy that game.

teardropmina

not me and my cat. but yes, D3 won't fail, no matter how you define failure, except for probably the irrelvant discussion of CRPG definitions.

Maybe it wont flop major but it also wont get over an 8.5 Diciples 3 will prolly get a better rating than that but i think both games will suck and imo spore shoulda got a 6.5

Idealy, Obsidian should've made a proper single player KOTOR 3 which continues the story from KOTOR 2. Oh well.

Still, the idea of a sci-fi MMO might have been somewhat appealing, if it wasn't for the fact that EA is publishing it. I'm not interesting in paying full price to get half the game at release, and then pay more money after release to get the other half of the game.

_Memento_

please no more ea games im tired of the challenges they have to make a good game they should stick to Sports only plz because that old Star wars galaxies MMO i think sucked much **** even though EA didnt make it they woulda made it just like that!

[QUOTE="niccodemus"][QUOTE="Lach0121"]

mmo's are the new thing

just like fps were back in the day, when wolfenstine, and doom came out, then came duke nukem, blood, shadow warrior, hexen, quake, unreal, almost the entire tom clancy series...

and mmo's are becomming like that now...

but people are trying to make hybrids now ahead of schedule, like Huxley, if it ever comes out.

Lach0121

Actually they really arent they have had lots and lots of MMO games before this we just didnt call them that

i guess your right ;p

[QUOTE="niccodemus"]... mod it to hell!teardropmina

check its moddibility with Beth before you dream up something like this...

Forget that if your a modder you know you can do it not matter what just gottta be smrt...or a genie